Integration, spatial dynamics and regional policy dilemmas in the European Union

PDF
Published: Oct 1, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/rp.18596
Keywords:
Integration cohesion regional policy EU
Γεώργιος Πετράκος
Professor, University of Thessaly
Abstract

This paper presents a critical account of the process of integration and its implications for the future of European Union. It analyses the type, strength and direction of trade and factor fl ows a mong places and the emerging geography of development in Europe. It argues that integration is not a space neutral process, as its main drivers are characterized by spatial selectivity and diverging performances, generating an overall unfavorable environment for laggingbehind regions in the EU. The paper also discusses the current regional policy dilemmas in the EU, arguing that top-down uniformity in policy choices and a strict framework of policy directives should be avoided, as different places may have to choose a different mix of regional policy that will correspond better to their needs. The paper also examines why the persistently underperforming regions in Europe cannot learn and benefi t from best-case examples and the success stories of other regions. Although factors affecting economic potential are usually different in advanced and less advanced regions, cohesion policies attempt to solve the underdevelopment problems of the lagging regions, only informed by the experience of the successful ones. The paper concludes that regional policy has to change in important ways. The new territorial approach requires policy to become more fl exible and more adaptive to local and regional needs. This means that uniformity in policy priorities and mix should be avoided and the proposed ‘pan-European approach’ should leave enough room for bottom up and place based approaches, as the experience shows that no single path or an a priori mix of policy tools exists for every place.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amin A., Charles D. and Howells J. (1992), Corporate Restructuring and Cohesion in the New Europe, Regional Studies, 26(3): 251-266.
Artelaris P., Kallioras D. and Petrakos G. (2010), Regional Inequalities and Convergence Clubs in the European Union New Member-States, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(1): 113-133.
Arvanitidis P., Petrakos G. and Pavleas S. (2007), Determinants of Economic Growth: The Experts’ View, University of Thessaly Discussion Paper Series,13(10): 245-276.
Barca F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent Report.
Barrios S. and Strobl E. (2005), The Dynamics of Regional Inequalities, European Commission Economic Papers, 229.
Borjas G. (1989), Economic Theory and International Migration, International Migration Review, 23(3): 457-485.
Brülhart M., Crozet M. and Koenig-Soubeyran P. (2004), Enlargement and the EU Periphery: The Impact of Changing Market Potential, The World Economy, 27(6): 853-875.
Button K. and Pentecost E. (1995), Testing for Convergence of the EU Regional Economies, Economic Inquiry, 33(4): 664-671.
Canova F. (2004), Testing for Convergence Clubs in Income per Capita: A Predictive Density Approach, International Economic Review, 45(1): 49-77.
Ciccone A. (2002), Agglomeration Effects in Europe, European Economic Review, 46: 213–227.
Camagni R. (1992), Development Scenarios and Policy Guidelines for the Lagging Regions in the 1990s, Regional Studies, 26(4): 361-374.
Combes P.-P. and Overman H. (2004), The Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities in the European Union, in V. Henderson and J.-F. Thisse (eds): Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Amsterdam: North Holland,2845-2910.
Cuadrado-Roura J. R. and Parellada M. (2002), Regional Disparities and Regional Convergence Problems in the EMU: Introduction, in Cuadrado-
Roura J. R. and Parellada M. (eds), Regional Convergence in the European Union: Facts, Prospects and Policies, Springer, 1-20.
European Commission (2010), EUROPE 2020: A European Strategy for Smart,Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Brussels: COM(2010) 2020,
Fingleton B. (1997), Specifi cation and Testing of Markov Chain Models: An Application to Convergence in the European Union, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59(3): 385-403.
Giannetti M. (2002), The Effects of Integration on Regional Disparities: Convergence, Divergence or Both? European Economic Review, 46: 539-567.
Greenwood M. J., Hunt G. L., Rickman D. S. and Treyz G. I. (1991), Migration, Regional Equilibrium and the Estimation of Compensating Differentials, American Economic Review, 81(5): 1382-1390.
Guerrieri P. and Rossi S. (2002), Real Competitive Advantages in the Single Currency Europe, in Cuadrado-Roura J. R. and Parellada M. (eds): Regional Convergence in the European Union: Facts, Prospects and Policies, Berlin: Springer, 165-181.
Heckscher E. (1919 / 1991), The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income, in Flam H. and Flanders M. (eds): Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory, Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press, 43-69.
Hurst C., Thisse J.-F. and Vanhoudt P. (2000), What Diagnosis for Europe’s ailing Regions? EIB Papers, 5(1): 9-29.
Kallioras D. and Petrakos G. (2010), Industrial Growth, Economic Integration and Structural Change: Evidence from the EU New Member-States Regions, Annals of Regional Science, 45: 667-680.
Lyons B., Matraves C. A. and Moffatt P. (2001), Industrial Concentration and Market Integration in the European Union, Economica, 68: 1-26.
Magrini S. (1999), The Evolution of Income Dispersion among the Regions of the European Union, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29: 257-281.
Martin P. and Ottaviano G. I. P. (2001), Growth and Agglomeration,International Economic Review, 42(4): 947-968.
Melachroinos K. A. (2002), European Integration and the Spatial Dynamics of Manufacturing Employment Change, Environment and Planning A, 34(11): 2017-2036.
Mora T. (2005), Elasticities of Ergodic Solutions in the Markov Chains Approach to Economic Growth Convergence, Papers in Regional Science, 84(1): 121-126.
Ohlin B. (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Paci R. and Pigliaru F. (1997), Structural Change and Convergence: An Italian Regional Perspective, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8: 297-318.
Paluzie E. (2001), Trade Policy and Regional Inequalities, Papers in Regional Science, 80(1): 67-85.
Petrakos G. (2008), Regional Inequalities in Europe: Refl ections on Evidence,Theory and Policy, Town Planning Review, 79(5): 7-13.
Petrakos G. (2011a), Diverging Geographies: New Challenges for Theories and Policies of Cohesion and Development’, Key-note speech in the 9th Hellenic
Regional Science Association Conference, Athens, 6-7 May 2011 (in Greek).
Petrakos G. (2011b), Integration, Spatial Dynamics and Regional Policy Dilemmas in the European Union, Presentation in the Polish Presidency International Seminar on the Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, 18-19 July 2011, Ostróda, Poland.
Petrakos G. and Artelaris P. (2009), Regional Convergence Revisited: A WLS Approach, Growth and Change, 40(2): 319-331.
Petrakos G., Kallioras D. and Anagnostou A. (2011), Regional Growth and Convergence in Europe: Understanding Patterns and Determinants,European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4): 375-391.
Petrakos G., Psycharis Y. and Kallioras D. (2005a), Regional Inequalities in the EU Accession Countries: Evolution and Challenges, in Bradley J., Petrakos
G. and Traistaru I. (eds): Integration, Growth and Cohesion in an Enlarged European Union, New York: Springer, 45-64.
Petrakos G., Rodriguez-Pose A. and Anagnostou A. (2005b), Regional Inequalities in the European Union, in Bradley J., Petrakos G. and Traistaru I. (eds): Integration, Growth and Cohesion in an Enlarged European Union, New York: Springer, 29-43.
Petrakos G., Rodriguez-Pose A. and Rovolis A. (2005c), Growth, Integration and Regional Disparities in the European Union, Environment and Planning A, 37(10): 1837-1855.
Puga D. (2002), European Regional Policy in the Light of Recent Location Theories, Journal of Economic Geography, 24(3): 373-406.
Quah D. (1996), Regional Convergence Clusters across Europe, European Economic Review, 40: 951–958.
Rodriguez-Pose A. (1999), Convergence or Divergence? Types of Regional Responses to Socio-Economic Change in Europe, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografi e, 90(4): 363-378.
Samuelson P. (1949), International Factor-Price Equalization Once Again, The Economic Journal, 9: 181-197.
Solow R. (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 65-94.
Swan T. (1956), Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation, Economic Record,32: 334-361.
Vojinović B. and Próchniak M. (2009), Divergence Period in the European Convergence Process, Transition Studies Review, 15: 685-700.