An assessment of European integration for the EU-15 (1971-2015)


Published: Dec 7, 2020
Keywords:
Eurozone EU Integration Unification Fiscal & Banking Union Common Production Union
Constantinos Ikonomou
Abstract
A long-term assessment of the EU integration process is attempted for the1971-2015 period, by comparing per capita Gross Domestic Product (in constant Purchasing Power Parities) and its change, for EU-15 and non-EU states that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. A growing divergence is found between Greece but also Portugal and the EU southern periphery on the one hand, and Luxembourg, Ireland and Scandinavian states on the other that have benefi ted from EU integration, especially after the Eurozone was formed. Those EU-15 members that have joined the Eurozone have not benefi ted as much as non-members. It is suggested that two types of states can be trapped by the integration process: The relative or absolute losers of the currency zone, like Greece and states like the UK that have benefi ted less from integration, while choosing to remain at an earlier integration stage. Given the mix of monetary and fi scal policies pursued, resolving the former problem will require setting-up a common production union to advance competitiveness and co-operation, while solution to the latter should avoid the risk of disintegration and of the permanent loss of EU membership.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abel, A.B., Bernankee, B.S. and Croushore, D. (2010) Macroeconomics, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. De Grauwe, P. (2013) ‘Design Failures in the Eurozone: Can they be fi xed?’ LEQS Paper No 57/2103, February 2013, http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS%20Discussion%20Paper%20Series/LEQSPaper57.pdf. Accessed 19th of December 2019. De Grauwe, P. and Heens, P. (1993) ‘Real exchange rate variability in monetary unions’, Researches Economiques de Louvain, 59(1-2), 105-117. De Grauwe, P. and Ji, Y. (2014) ‘The Future of Eurozone’, The Manchester School, 82, 15-34. De Grauwe, P. and Ji, Y. (2015) ‘Correcting for the Eurozone Design Failures: The Role of the ECB’, Journal of European Integration, 37(7), 739-754. De Grauwe, P. and Vanhaverbeke, W. (1991) Is Europe and optimum currency area? Evidence from Regional Data, In Masson, P.R., & Taylor, M.P. (Eds), Policy Issues in the Operation of a Currency Union, pp. 111-129, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Frieden, J. and Walter, S. (2017) ‘Understanding the Political Economy of the Eurozone Crisis’, Annual Review of Political Science, 20: 371-390. Ikonomou, C. (2018) Funding the Greek Crisis: The European Union, Cohesion Policies and the Great Recession, Cambridge, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press. Ikonomou, C. (2020) A New Integration Era in the EU: Theory, Assessment and Main Challenges, text uploaded at SSRN. Maraveyas, N. (Ed.) (2016) European Union: Creation, Evolution and Prospects, Athens: “Kritiki” Editions, in Greek. Maraveyas, N. and Katsikas, D. (2016) ‘The Economics of European Integration’, in Maraveyas, N. (Ed) European Union: Creation, Evolution and Prospects, p.p. 149-189, Athens: “Kritiki” Editions, in Greek. Todaro, M.P., and Smith, S.C. (2015) Economic Development, New York: Pearson.
Most read articles by the same author(s)