Eurosceptic about What? Knowledge Gaps and Public Euroscepticism Across Crises
Abstract
Euroscepticism has been woven into the fabric of EU politics for nearly forty years now, reaching its peak especially in times of crisis. Theory suggests that there is a positive relationship between levels of knowledge about the EU and support for it, as better understanding of its nature and policies can mitigate the drivers of public Euroscepticism. Yet, does this account hold under the exceptional circumstances of the ongoing polycrisis, when satisfaction with the EU depends also on the information about the measures taken for the handling of each crisis? The results of this longitudinal analysis of Eurobarometer data reveal a paradox: Although Euroscepticism is reinforced during turbulent political waters, it is often triggered by policies that citizens do not fully understand or are not well informed about.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Saoulidou, M. Z. (2025). Eurosceptic about What? Knowledge Gaps and Public Euroscepticism Across Crises. Perifereia | Regional Integration: Politics, Economics, Governance, 19, 137–152. Retrieved from https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/periphery/article/view/43037
- Section
- Research Note

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.