Does self-categorization process in Roma children explain their difficulties at school?


Published: Oct 15, 2020
Keywords:
Infancy Meta-stereotypes School age School failure Self-categorization Roma
Δημήτρης Πνευματικός
Μαρία Γκέκα
Μαρία Διβανέ
Abstract

The current study aimed at the understanding of the difficulties Roma children encounter in school through the understanding of the process of their selfcategorization. It is examined whether the stereotypes of the dominant group for them are adopted by the young Roma through the self-categorization process adjusting their behavior. The behavior beyond the ordinal school rules, the school failure and the vocational guidance as stereotypes of the Greek society for the Roma were examined as well. Forty Roma infants and children participated in the study. Participants identified themselves with a Roma protagonist of the puppet show who was in intergroup comparisons and afterwards they answered questions about the dimensions of the school life that correspond to negative stereotypes for the Roma. Results showed that the stereotypes of the out group are recognized and attributed to the Roma protagonist since their infancy, and without having the experience of the actual intergroup relations within the school settings. Roma children adopted the stereotypes denoting that they have behavioral problems at school, that they have learning difficulties, and that they will follow a job of a low social status in their lives. The actual intergroup conditions during schooling change some of the adopted stereotypes through the process of the self-categorization. The results are discussed in the light of the intervention programs.

Article Details
  • Section
  • RESEARCH PAPERS
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Dimakos, I. & Papakonstantinopoulou, A. (2012).
Providing psychological and counseling services
to Roma students: A preliminary report for a
three-year longitudinal project’, in P. Cunningham
& N. Fretwell (Eds.) Creating Communities: Local,
National and Global (pp. 94-103). London: CiCe.
Haslam, S.A., Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., McGarthy, C.,
& Reynolds, K. (1997). The group as a basis for
emergent stereotype consensus. European
Review of Social Psychology, 8, 203-239.
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, Selfcategorization,
and the communication of group
norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7-30.
Joffe, H. & Staerkle, Ch. (2007). The centrality of the
self-control ethos in Western aspersions
regarding outgroups: A social representational
approach to stereotype content. Culture and
Psychology, 13(4), 397-418.
Kάτσικας, Χ., Πολίτου, Ε. (1999). Τσιγγάνοι, μειονο-
τικοί, παλιννοστούντες και αλλοδαποί στην Ελλη-
νική εκπαίδευση: Εκτός «Τάξης» το «Διαφορετι-
κό». Αθήνα: Gutenberg.
Klein, O., & Azzi, A. E. (2001). The strategic
confirmation of meta-stereotypes: How group
members attempt to tailor an outgroup’s
representation of themselves. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 40, 279-293.
Kligman, G. (2001). On the social construction of
“otherness”: Identifying “the Roma” in postsocialist
communities. Review of Sociology, 7(2),
-78.
Λαμπρίδης, Ε. (2004). Στερεότυπο, προκατάληψη,
κοινωνική ταυτότητα: Μελετώντας τις δυναμικές
της κοινωνικής αναπαράστασης για τους τσιγ-
γάνους. Αθήνα: Gutenberg.
Lo Coco, A., Inguglia, C., & Pace, U. (2005).
Children’s understanding of ethnic belonging and
the development of ethnic attitudes. In M. Barrett,
& E. Buchanan-Barrow (Eds.), Children’s
understanding of society (pp. 223-250). New
York: Psychology Press.
Maass, A. & Cadinu, M. (2003). Stereotype threat:
When minority members underperform. European
Review of Social Psychology, 14, 243-275.
McGarty, C. (1999). Categorisation in social
psychology. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Milcher, S. (2006). Poverty and the determinants of
welfare for Roma and other vulnerable groups in
Μπορεί η διαδικασία της αυτο-κατηγοριοποίησης των παιδιών Ρομά 207
Southeastern Europe. Comparative Economic
Studies, 48, 20-35.
Pérez, J.A., Moscovici, S., Chulvi, B. (2007). The
taboo against group contact: Hypothesis of
Gypsy ontologization. The British Journal of
Social Psychology, 46(2), 249-272.
Pnevmatikos, D., Geka, M. & Divane, M. (2010). The
emergence, development and structure of ethnic
identity during childhood: The case of Roma
identity. International Journal of Psychology,
(6), 435-442.
Shelton, J.N., Richeson, J.A., & Vorauer, J.D. (2006).
Threatened identities and interethnic interactions.
European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1),
-154.
Turner, J.C. & Onorato, R. (1999). Social identity,
personality and the self-concept: A selfcategorization
perspective. In T.R. Tyler, R.
Kramer, & O. John (Eds), The psychology of the
social self. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D.,
& Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the
social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford,
UK: Blackwell.
UNDP. (2002). The Roma in Central and Eastern
Europe: Avoiding the dependency trap: Regional
human development report. UNDP: Bratislava.
Vorauer, J.D., Main, K.J. & O’Connell, G., B. (1998).
How do individuals expect to be viewed by
members of lower status groups? Content and
implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917-937.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value
theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Most read articles by the same author(s)