An exploration of postgraduate students’ conceptions of the nature of argument
Abstract
Study at postgraduate level requires the development of the skills of argument in developing both theoretical and empirical work. This study aimed to explore conceptions of argument among post-graduate students using qualitative methods within a quasi-experimental design. Thirty nine students, divided into two groups, participated. Each
group completed two tasks in a different order. Task 1 required each student to describe in writing how an argument might be used to add to knowledge and to list any characteristic structural features of an argument. Task 2 required the reading of a short text which was then evaluated in relation to its use of argument. For each task, small group discussion of differences, similarities and changes in views was tape-recorded. The findings showed considerable agreement regarding the main characteristics of an argument but variability in how argument was perceived to add to knowledge. The findings are discussed in relation to the work of Kuhn (1991) and in terms of their educational implications.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Hallam, S., & Francis, H. (2020). An exploration of postgraduate students’ conceptions of the nature of argument. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 17(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23772
- Issue
- Vol. 17 No. 4 (2010)
- Section
- SPECIAL SECTION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
