The perspective of multiple modernities on Shmuel N. Eisenstadt’s sociology


Δημοσιευμένα: Jul 20, 2015
Gerhard Preyer
Περίληψη
No abstract
Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Arnason, J. P. (2005). ‘The Axial Age and its Interpreters. Reopening a Debate’, in J. P. Arnason, S. N. Eisenstadt & B. Wit- trock (eds.), Axial Civilizations and World History, Leiden.
Arnason, J. P, Eisenstadt, S. N. & Wittrock, B. (eds.) (2005). Axial Civilizations and World History. Leiden.
Bellah, R. N. (1957). Tokugawa Religion. Glencoe.
Bellah, R. N. (2005). ‘What is Axial about the Axial Age?’, European Journal of Sociology 46: 69-89.
Ben-Rafael, E. & Sternber, Y. (2005). ‘Social Change: Contribution of S. N. Eisenstadt’, in Encyclopaedia of Sociology, Voi. 9, Oxford.
Black, C. E. (1966). The Dynamics of Modernization. A Study in Comparative History. London.
Eisen stadt, S. N. (1963). Political System of Empire. New York.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1965). Essays on Comparative Institution. New York.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1971). Social Differentiation and Stratification. Glenview.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1971).‘The Embedment of the Political in Social Structure in Primitive Societies’, in S. N. Eisenstadt (ed.), Political Sociology. New York.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1978). Revolution and the Transformation of Societies. New York.
Eisen stadt, S. N. (1982). ‘The Axial Age. The Emergence of Transcendental Visions and the Rise of Clerics’, European Journal of Sociology 23: 294-314.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1986). A Sociological Approach to Comparative Civilizations: The Development and Directions of a Research Programm. The Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace, Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Jerusalem [rep. 2004, in ProtoSociology 24: Shmuel N. Eisenstadt: Multiple Modernities-A Paradigm of Cultural and Social Evolution, 260-317].
Eisen stadt, S. N. (1989). ‘Cultural Premises and the Limits of Convergence in Modern Societies: An Examination of Some Aspects of Japanese Experience’, Diogene 147: 125-140.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1990). ‘Patterns of Conflict and Conflict Resolution in Japan: Some Comparative Indications’, in S. N. Eisen- stadt & E. Ben-Ari (eds.), Japanese Models of Conflict Resolution. London.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1994). ‘Japan: Non-Axial Modernity and the Multiplicity of Cultural and Institutional Programs of Modernity’, in J. Kreiner (ed.), Japan in Global Context, Papers Presented on the Occasion of the Fifth Anniversary of the German Institute for Japanese Studies, Philipp-Franz-von-Siebold Stiftung, Tokyo.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1995). Power, Trust, and Meaning. Essays in Sociological Theory and Analysis. Chicago.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1996). ‘The Jacobin Component of Fundamentalist Movements’, Contention 5 (3), 155-170 [rep. 2003, in Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities II., Leiden].
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1998). ‘Social Division of Labor, Construction of Centers and Institutional Dynamics. A Reassessment of the Structural-Evolutionary Perspective’, in G. Prey er (ed.), Strukturelle Evolution und das Weltsystem. Theorien, Sozialstruktur und evolutionäre Entwicklungen. Frankfurt a. M.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000a). Die Vielheit der Moderne. Weilerswist.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000b). ‘The Civilizational Dimension in Sociological Analysis’, Thesis Eleven 62: 1-21.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2002). ‘Multiple Modernities’, 1, in: Eisenstadt (ed.), Multiple Modernities. New Brunswick.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2003a). ‘Introduction: Comparative Studies and Sociological Theory. From Comparative Studies to Civilizational Analysis: Autobiographical Notes’, in Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities I. Leiden.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2003b). ‘Multiple Modernities’, in Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities II. Leiden.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2004). ‘Multiple Modernities: The Basic Framework and Problematic’, in ProtoSociology 24: Shmuel N. Eisen- stadt: Multiple Modernities-A Paradigm of Cultural and Social Evolution.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2006a). Die großen Revolutionen und die Kulturen der Moderne. Wiesbaden.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2006b). ‘Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Eine analytische und vergleichende Darstellung’, in Theorie und Moderne. Soziologische Essays. Wiesbaden.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (2009). ‘Cultural Programmes, the Construction of Collective Identities and the Continual Reconstruction of Pri- mordiality’, in G. Preyer (ed.), Neuer Mensch und kollektive Identität in der Kommunikationsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (forthcoming). ‘The Axial Conundrum. Between Transcendental Visions and Vicissitudes of their Institutionalizations: Constructive and Destructive Possibilities’.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (ed.) (1986). The Origins and Diversity of AxialAge Civilizations. New York.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (ed.) (1987). Kulturen der Achsenzeit I. Ihre Ursprünge und ihre Vielfalt. Frankfurt a. M.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (ed.) (1992). Kulturen der Achsenzeit II. Ihre institutioneile und kulturelle Dynamik. Frankfurt a. M.
Eisenstadt, S. N. & Giesen, E. B. (1995). ‘The Construction of Collective Identity’, European Journal of Sociology, 36: 72-102.
Eisenstadt, S. N. & Roninger, L. (1984). Patrons, Clients and Friends. Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge.
Eisenstadt, S. N. & Roninger, L. (1995). ‘Patron Client Relation as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange’, in Power, Trust, and Meaning.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. Cambridge.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline f the Theory of Structuration. Oxford.
Jaspers, K. (1953 [1949]). The Origin and Goal of History, London.
Lehmann, M. (2002). Inklusion. Beobachtung einer sozialen Form am Beispiel von Religion und Kirche. Frankfurt a. M.
Levi, M. J. (1966). Modernization and the Structure of Society. A Setting for International Affairs. Princeton NJ.
Mayer, E. (1976). Evolution and the Diversity of Life. Cambridge.
Münch, R. (1986). Die Kultur der Moderne (2 vols.), vol. 1 Ihre Grundlagen und ihre Entwicklung in England und Amerika, voi. 2 Ihre Entwicklung in Frankreich und Deutschland. Frankfurt a. M.
Münch, R. (1992). Dialektik der Kommunikationsgesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.
Münch, R. (1995a). ‘Soziale Bewegungen I: Zwischen Moderne und Antimoderne’, in Dynamik der Kommunikationsgesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.
Münch, R. (1995b). ‘Soziale Bewegungen II: Die Dialektik von Fundamentalismus und Moderne’, in Dynamik der Kommunikationsgesellschaft. Frankfurt a. Μ.
Myrdal, G. (1998 [1944]). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modem Democracy. New Brunswick NJ.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2001). Development Theory. Deconstmc- tion/Reconstmction. London.
Parsons, T. (1967). ‘Evolutionary Universale in Society’, in T. Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modem Society. New York.
Preyer, G. (1998). ‘Mitgliedschaftsbedingungen. Zur soziologischen Kerntheorie einer Protosoziologie’, in G. Preyer (ed.), Stmk- turelle Evolution und das Weltsystem. Theorien, Sozialstmktur und evolutionäre Entwicklungen. Frankfurt a. M.
Preyer, G. (2006). Soziologische Theorie der Gegenwartsgesellschaft (3 vols.), I: Mitgliedschaftstheoretische Untersuchungen. Wiesbaden.
Preyer, G. (2008). Soziologische Theorie der Gegenwartsgesellschaft (3 vols.), Ill: Mitgliedschaft und Evolution. Wiesbaden.
Preyer, G. (2010). Max Webers Religionssoziologie. Eine Neubewertung. Frankfurt a. M.
Preyer, G. (2011). Zur Aktualität von Shmuel N. Eisenstadt. Einleitung in sein Werk. Wiesbaden.
Schneider, D. M. & Smith, R. T. (1979). Class Difference and Sex Role in American Kinship and Family Stmcture. Englewood Cliffs.
Schwartz, B. I. (1975). ‘The Age of Transcendence’, Daedalus 104.2: 1-7.
Sewell, W. (1992). ‘A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1-29.
Turner, B. S. (ed.) (1992). Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity. Sage (CA).
Weber, M. & Shils, E. (1975). Center and Periphery. Chicago.
Weiner, M. (1966). Modernization. The Dynamics of Groth, Voice of America Forum Lectures.