Female role models in contemporary children’s informational books Breaking the gender ideological dichotomy in the field of Science


Published: Dec 12, 2022
Keywords:
children's literature informational books autobiography gender stereotypes scientific literacy
Rosy Triantafyllia Angelaki
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5096-2211
Abstract

Children’s informational books are multimodal and serve an educational purpose. Their primary goal is to inform children of pre-school age and early-school age about the world they live in through simple documented descriptions. However, in recent years, many children’s informational books intentionally weave fictional elements into their stories. These modern texts are often idiosyncratic and share common characteristics with elements found in fictional biography, autobiography and children’s picture books, a fact which confirms the hybridity of this new emerging genre. When the books are biographical or autobiographical, incentives are assigned to the characters who expose parts of themselves as they are being revealed to their readers. In these types of narratives, the characters are considered to be invented and the reality of what shapes their actions is defined as being semiotically organized. This article deals with children’s informational books with an autobiographical content in whose pages reality and fiction intertwine and identities are reinvented. We will examine how two women authors engage their readers in a textual game of discovering the identity of the female scientist narrators who act as role models by supplying information on their activities. We will see how they blend real information with the powers of the imagination as well as how they attempt to bust stereotypes in the male-dominated scientific field. More specifically, we examine Stella Kasdagli’s book 30 women who have changed the world and how you can change it, too (2020) and Miranda Colombo’s Atlas of important people: 101 historical figures who have changed the world (2019). We shall explore the ways in which these two authors inform their young readers of the role of women in the Sciences not only in order to educate them on scientific matters but also to contribute to the eradication of gender discrimination and inequality, specifically where women in the fields of Sciences and Technology are concerned. Methodologically, qualitative content analysis was used in combination with the tenets of New Criticism. Basic categories include theme, characters, setting, the narrator and the ideological content and poetics of the chosen authors. The final result of informational books also involves the intentions of the illustrator and raises issues about young reader/spectator the response.  Therefore, by extension, the aesthetic value and the semiotics of the images are also examined in order to ascertain whether they present a unified visual and semiotic whole and whether they complement or usurp the linguistic version of the text.  The basis for all of the above is the classification of Nikolajeva και Scott (2001) and the theory regarding the ‘grammar’ of the visual text as formulated by Kress και van Leeuwen (2003).


 

Article Details
  • Section
  • New researchers
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Rosy Triantafyllia Angelaki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hellenic Open University

Η Ρόζη Αγγελάκη είναι Ιστορικός, Τουρκολόγος και μεταδιδακτορική ερευνήτρια στο Τμήμα Επιστημ΄ών Προσχολικής Αγωγής και Εκπαίδευσης ΄του Αριστοτελείου Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλονίκης, όπου διδάσκει Ιστορία Παιδικής Λογοτεχνίας και Πολυπολυτισμική Παιδική Λογοτεχνία. Στο Πανεπιστήμιο Λευκωσίας διδάσκει θεωρία και χαρακτηριστικά παιδικού βιβλίου και Λογοτεχνία στον Ψηφιακό Πολιτισμό, ενώ δε στο Ελληνικό Ανοικτό Πανεπιστήμιο ποιοτική και ποσοτική μεθοδολογία έρευνας.

References
Αγγελάκη, Ρ. Τ. (2021). Η Ελληνική Επανάσταση στο βιβλίο γνώσεων: Μια προσπάθεια εγχάραξης της εθνικής ιστορικής μνήμης και της συλλογικής ταυτότητας στις παιδικές αφηγηματικές αναπαραστάσεις. Κείμενα Παιδείας, 2(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12681/keimena-paideias.26612
Ασωνίτης, Π. (2001). Η εικονογράφηση στο βιβλίο παιδικής λογοτεχνίας. Καστανιώτης.
Anderson, N. A. (2002). Elementary children’s literature. Allyn & Bacon.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171-194.
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. University of California Press.
Barry, P. (2013). Γνωριμία με τη θεωρία. Μια εισαγωγή στη λογοτεχνική και πολιτισμική θεωρία, 2η Έκδ. Βιβλιόραμα.
Barton, K., McCully, A. W., & Marks, M. J. (2004). Reflecting on elementary children's understanding of history and social studies: An inquiry project with beginning teachers in Northern Ireland and the United States. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 70-90.
Beasley, C. (2008). Rethinking Hegemonic Masculinity in a Globalizing World. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08315102
Bentοn, M. (2006). Η κριτική της αναγνωστικής ανταπόκρισης. Στο P. Hunt (Επιμ.), Κατανοώντας τη Λογοτεχνία για Παιδιά (Χ. Μητσοπούλου, Μτφρ.) (σσ. 96- 130). Μεταίχμιο.
Benton, M. (2011). Towards a Poetics of Literary Biography. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 45(3), 67-87. doi:10.5406/jaesteduc.45.3.0067
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: a social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195.
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441-458.
Buck, G. A., Leslie-Pelecky, D., & Kirby, S. K. (2002). Bringing female scientists into the elementary classroom: Confronting the strength of elementary students’ stereotypical images of scientists. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 1-9.
Bruner, J. (1993). The Autobiographical Process. In R. Folkenflik (Ed.), The Culture of Autobiography. Constructions of Self-Representations (pp. 38-56). Stanford University Press.
Γαζή, Έ. (2003). Περί μεταμοντερνισμού και ιστοριογραφίας. Ο Πολίτης, 107, 18-21.
Cockburn, C. (2009). On “The Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men, and Technical Know-How”. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1/2), 269-273.
Diekman, A. B., Johnston, A. M., & Loescher, A. L. (2013). Something old, something new: Evidence of self-accommodation to gendered social change. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 68(9-10), 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0263-6
Doonan, J. (1999). ‘Beware Beware’: Image, word and apprehension. In G. C.Hodges, M. J. Drummond, & M. Styles (Eds.), Tales, Tellers and Texts (pp.102-115). Cassell.
Eakin, P. J. (1985). Fictions in Autobiography. Studies in the art of Self- Invention. Princeton University Press.
Eakin, P. J. (1986). Philippe Lejeune and the Study of Autobiography. Romance Studies, 4(2), 1-14. doi:10.1179/026399087786621501
Fisher, R.W. (1984) Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1-22. doi:10.1080/03637758409390180
Folkenflik, R. (1993). Introduction: The Institution of Autobiography. In R. Folkenflik (Ed.), The Culture of Autobiography. Constructions of Self-Representations (pp. 1-19). Stanford University Press.
Gallagher, J. J., & Harsh, G. (1997). Scientific Literacy: Science Education and Secondary Students. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific Literacy (pp.13-34). IPN.
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method (J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Cornell University Press.
Genette, G., Marin, L., & Mathieu-Colas, Μ. (1987). Tα Όρια της Διήγησης (Ε. Θεοδωροπούλου, Μτφ.). Καρδαμίτσα.
Gilles, C., Pierce, K.M., Andre, M., Bargiel, S., Beck, C., Dye, C., & Wolf, S. (2001). Pairing fact and fiction for deep understanding. Language Arts, 78(6), 579-588.
Gilmore, L. (1994). The mark of Autobiography: Postmodernism, Autobiography, and Genre. In A. Kathleen, G. Leigh, & P. Gerald (Eds.), Autobiography and Postmodernism (pp. 3-18). The University of Massachusetts.
Hacking, I. (1992). Review of Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. The Pasteurization of France, by B. Latour, A. Sheridan, & J. Law. Philosophy of Science, 59(3), 510-512.
Harding, S. (1983). Is gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issues. In C. C. Gould (Ed.), Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Women and Philosophy (pp. 43-63). Littlefield Adams.
Harding, S. (2004). Rethinking feminist standpoint epistemology: what is “strong objectivity”? Ιn S. Harding (Ed.), The Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies (pp. 127-140). Routledge.
Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Reflexive Positioning. Autobiography. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning Theory (pp. 60-73). Blackwell.
Hekman, S. (1997). Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited. Signs, 22(2), 341-365.
Hurd, P. D. (1997). Scientific Literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416.
Jay, P. (1984). Being in the Text. Self-Representation from Wordsworth to Roland Barthes. Cornell University Press.
Κανατσούλη, Μ. (2018). Εισαγωγή στη Θεωρία και Κριτική της Παιδικής Λογοτεχνίας σχολικής και προσχολικής ηλικίας (3η έκδ.). University Studio Press.
Καρπόζηλου, Μ. (2000). Το παιδί στη χώρα των βιβλίων. Καστανιώτης.
Κάσδαγλη, Σ. (2020). 30 γυναίκες που άλλαξαν τον κόσμο και πως μπορείς να τον αλλάξεις κι εσύ. Πατάκης.
Κολόμπο, Μ. (2019). Άτλαντας σπουδαίων προσωπικοτήτων. 101 προσωπικότητες της Ιστορίας που άλλαξαν τον κόσμο (Σ. Παχή, Μτφρ.). Ψυχογιός.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2003). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge.
Løvland, A. (2016). Talking about something real: the concept of truth in multimodal non-fiction books for young people. Prose Studied, 38(2), 172-187. doi:10.1080/01440357.2016.1232784
Lukens, R. J. (2003). A Critical Handbook of Children's Literature (7th Ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Μαραγκουδάκη, Ε. (1993). Εκπαίδευση και Διάκριση των Φύλων. Παιδικά αναγνώσματα στο Νηπιαγωγείο. Οδυσσέας.
Μπακαλάκη, Α. (1994). Ανθρωπολογία, Γυναίκες και Φύλο. Αλεξάνδρεια.
Μπενέκος, Α. (1980). Το Εικονογραφημένο Βιβλίο. Σύγχρονο Νηπιαγωγείο, 9-10, 453-469.
McCallum, R., & Zipes, J. D. (1999). Ideologies of Identity in Adolescent Fiction: The Dialogic Construction of Subjectivity. Routledge.
Narančić - Kovač, S. (2020). A semiotic approach to non-fiction picturebooks. In G. Grilli (Ed.), Non-fiction picturebooks: Sharing knowledge as an Aesthetic Experience (pp. 69-89). Edizioni ETS.
Nora, P. (1978). La mémoire collective. Dans L. Le Goff (Dir.). La Nouvelle Histoire (pp. 398-401). Retz-CEPL.
Norton, D. E. (2003). Through the Eyes of a Child. An Introduction to Children’s Literature. Merrill Prentice Hall.
Onley, J. (1980). Autobiography. Essays Theoretical and Critical. Princeton University Press.
Pella, M. O., O’Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. G. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199-208.
Prewitt, K. (1983). Scientific illiteracy and democratic theory. Daedalus, 112(2), 49–64.
Ρεντετζή, Μ. (2006a). Η σκιαγράφηση της ιστορίας των γυναικών στις επιστήμες. Σύγχρονα Θέματα, 94, 50-61.
Ρεντετζή, Μ. (2006b). Φύλο και φυσικές επιστήμες: έμφυλα στερεότυπα και εκπαιδευτικές στρατηγικές υπονόμευσής τους. Θέματα στην Εκπαίδευση, 7(1), 97-120.
Ricoeur, P. (1983). Temps et récit. L'intrigue et le récit historique. Seuil.
Rosaldo, Μ., & Lampher, L. (1974). Woman, Culture and Society. Stanford University Press.
Σακελλαρίου, Χ. (1990). Ιστορία της Παιδικής Λογοτεχνίας. Φιλιππότη.
Shortland, M. (1988). Advocating science: Literacy and public understanding. Impact of Science on Society, 38(4), 305-316.
Spivak, G. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard University Press.
Sprinker, M. (1980). Fictions of the Self: The end of Autobiography. In O. James (Ed.), Autobiography. Essays Theoretical and Critical (pp. 321-342). Princeton University Press.
Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2017). Sandra Bem’s Gender Schema Theory After 34 Years: A Review of its Reach and Impact. Sex Roles, 76, 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0591-4
Stoltzfus, Β. (1998). Roland Barthes and Alain Robbe- Grillet: autobiography as fiction/ fiction as autobiography. The International Fiction Review, 15(1), 1-8.
Τριάντου, Ι. (2012). Από τη Θεωρία στην Ερμηνεία της Λογοτεχνίας. Ίων.
Tong, R. (1998). Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction (2nd Ed.). Allen & Unwin.
Wahl, A, Holgersson, C. Hook, P., & Linghag, S. (2005). «Εντάξει»: Θεωρίες για την Οργάνωση και το Φύλο (Χρ. Παππάς, Μτφρ.). ΚΕΘΙ.
Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143-152.
Wittrock, Β. (2000). Modernity. One, none, or many? European origins and modernity as a global condition. Daedalus, 129(1), 31-60.