Towards a re-allocation of responsibilities and a new division of power in the EU


Published: Jul 29, 2020
Keywords:
Economic governance EU Institutions New intergovermentalism
Achilleas Mitsos
Abstract

The crisis has brought about a major re-allocation of responsibilities and power between and within states and institutions. The radical change in EU economic governance does not only refer to the involvement of supranational institutions and bodies in the decisions on the total national budget but also on the structure of national revenues and expenditures and the level of specific categories of revenue and expenditure of national budgets. In addition, the introduction of all sorts of conditionalities adds a wide range of measures and policies to those in which the EU and the member states have co-responsibility. Furthermore, the economic crisis has brought about signifi cant changes in the institutional balance of the European Union. More and more critical decisions seem to be taken solely as a result of intergovernmental consultations. The European Council is strengthened and assumes the dominant role, the European Parliament is marginalized, the Council of Ministers often becomes a simple forum for validation of major decisions taken in other informal bodies and the European Commission sees its role restricted to its executive responsibility.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Note
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Achilleas Mitsos, University of the Aegean

Former Director General of the European Commission and Professor of International Economic Relations at the University of the Aegean

References
BertonciniY., V. Kreilinger (2012), Seminar on the Community Method. Elements of Synthesis, Notre Europe.BickertonC., D. Hodson, U. Puetter (2015), “The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53/4: 703-722.Bressanelli E., N. Chelotti (2016), “The Shadow of the European Council. Understanding Legislation on Economic Governance”, Journal of European Integration, 38/5: 511-525.Buti M., M. Krobath (2019), Should the eurozone be less intergovernmental? LUISS.Chalmers D., M. Jachtenfuchs, C. Joerges (2016), “The retransformation of Europe” in Chalmers D., M. Jachtenfuchs, C. Joerges (eds), The End of the Eurocrats’ Dream: Adjusting to European Diversity, Cambridge University Press.Dawson M. (2015), “The Legal and Political Accountability Structure of “Post Crisis” EU Economic Governance”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53/5:976-993.Dehouse R. (2016), “Why Has Macroeconomic Governance Become More Supranational?”, Journal of European Integration, 38/5: 617-631.Fabbrini S., U. Puetter (2016), “Integration Without Supranationalisation: Studying the Lead Roles of the European Council and the Council in Post-Lisbon EU Politics”, Journal of European Integration, 38/5:481-495.Habermas J. (2015), The Lure of Technocracy, Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.perifereia t.9o.indd 13915/6/2020 1:18:05 μμ
ΠΕΡΙΦΕΡΕΙΑΚαραγκούνης Δ., Μ.Ι. Ράντου (2013), «Η Νομική Φύση των Πράξεων του Eurogroup», Ελληνική Επιθεώρηση Ευρωπαϊκού Δικαίου, 2013/2:139-146.Konstantinidis N., R. Treurniert (2018), “Accountability in the Economic and Monetary Union: the “globalization trilemma”, in Zahariadis N. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of European public policy, pp.132-141.Laffan B. (2016), “Europe’s Union in Crisis: Tested and Contested”, West European Politics, 39:5, 915-932.Majone G. (2005), Dilemmas of European Integration. The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth, Oxford University Press.Merkel A. (2010), Speech by Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel at the opening ceremony of the 61st academic year of the College of Europe in Bruges on 2 November 2010.Vilpišauskas R. (2013),“Eurozone Crisis and European Integration: Functional Spillover, Political Spillback?” Journal of European Integration, 35/3:361-373.Von Ordarza N. (2013), ‘‘Strengthening the Core or Splitting Europe?’’ SWP Research Paper, March.
Most read articles by the same author(s)