Figure and number as representational tools: The case of temporal relations’ problem solving
Published:
Oct 15, 2020
Keywords:
Problem solving Representations Temporal relations Number Figure Metacognition
Abstract
Time is a complex concept. As such, its understanding and manipulation on a cognitive level develops slowly during childhood and adolescence. The present study examines problem-solving, reasoning and metacognitive abilities of schoolaged children on temporal-relation problems. It also examines the influence of different representational
means of time quantification, i.e., numerical and figural, on children’s performance. This research concerns 233 school-aged children, which were presented with seven problems. They were first asked to answer each problem. After solving the problem, half of the children were asked to represent the described temporal relations in numbers and then in figures, whereas the other half had to represent the problem in the opposite order. After each representation, children were asked to check their original answer to the problem, with the option to either maintain it or revise it. Results show that for school-aged children: (a) “initial temporal order” is a difficult concept to grasp compared to the concepts of “final order” and “duration of events”; b) the use of numbers leads to adequate representation of time and facilitates the figural one, whereas the opposite pattern was not observed; and c) up to 10 years of age, children’s meta-cognitive, and especially selfcorrection capacity, seems to be very poor.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Σαμαρτζή Σ., & Καζή Σ. (2020). Figure and number as representational tools: The case of temporal relations’ problem solving. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 18(4), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23730
- Issue
- Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011)
- Section
- SPECIAL SECTION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bjorklund, D. & Green, B. (1992). The adaptive nature
of cognitive immaturity. American Psychologist,
(1), 46-54.
Bruchkowsky, M. (1992). The development of
empathic cognition in middle and early
childhood. In R. Case (Ed.), The mind’s staircase:
Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of
children’s thought and knowledge (pp. 153-170).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Capodilupo, A. M. (1992). A neo-structural analysis of
children’s response to instruction in the sightreading
of musical notation. In R. Case (Ed.), The
mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual
underpinnings of children’s thought and
knowledge (pp. 99-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L.
(2010). Space and Time in the Child’s Mind:
Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry.
Cognitive Science, 34, 387-405.
Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C.
(2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how
number magnitude affects visuospatial attention.
Cognition, 102(1), 101-117.
Case, R. & Οkamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central
conceptual structures in the development of
children’s numerical, literacy and spatial thought.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development (Serial No. 246).
Crépault, J. (1989). Temps et raisonnement:
Dévelopement cognitif de l’enfant à l’adulte. Lille:
Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Cole, M., & Cole, S.R. (2000). Η ανάπτυξη των παιδιών
- Η αρχή της ζωής: Εγκυμοσύνη, τοκετός, βρεφική
ηλικία. Αθήνα: Τυπωθήτω - Γιώργος Δαρδανός.
Δημητρίου, Α. (1993). Γνωστική ανάπτυξη: Μοντέλα -
Μέθοδοι - Εφαρμογές. Τόμος 1: Piaget και Νεο-
πιαζετιανοί. Θεσσαλονίκη: Art of Text.
Dean, A. L., Chabaud, S., & Bridges, E. (1981).
Classes, collections, and distinctive features:
Alternative strategies for solving inclusion
problems. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 84-112.
Dehaence, S., Bossini, S., & Gitaux, P. (1993). The
mental representations of parity and numerical
magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 122, 371-396.
Demetriou, A. & Kazi, S. (2006). Self-awareness in g
(with processing efficiency and reasoning).
Intelligence, 34, 297-317.
Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., & Mouyi, A. (2011).
Educating the developing mind. Towards an
overarching paradigm. Educational Psychology
Review, 23(4), 601-663.
Dennis, S. (1992). Stage and structure in the
development of children’s spatial representations.
In R. Case (Ed.), The mind’s staircase: Exploring
the conceptual underpinnings of children’s
thought and knowledge (pp. 229-266). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Griffin, S. A., Case, R., & Sandieson, R. (1992).
Synchrony and asynchrony in the acquisition of
children’s everyday mathematical knowledge. In R.
Case (Ed.), The mind’s staircase: Exploring the
conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and
knowledge (pp. 75-98). Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.
Eysenck, M. W. & Keane, M. T. (1990). Cognitive
Psychology: A Student’s Handbook. Hilsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Fischer, K. W. & Pipp, S. L. (1984). Processes of
cognitive development: Optimal level and skill
acquisition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms
of cognitive development (pp. 45-80). San
Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co.
Friedman, W. J. (1982). Conventional time concepts
and children’s structuring of time. In W. J.
Friedman (Eds.), The developmental psychology
of time (pp. 171-208). New York: Academic Press.
Friedman, W. J. (1989). The representation of
temporal structure in children, adolescents and
adults. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and
human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp.
-304). North Holland: Elsevier Science
Publishers.
Friedman, W. J. (2005). Developmental and cognitive
perspectives on humans’ sense of the time of
past and future events. Learning and Motivation,
, 145-158.
Garrett, A. J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Baker, L. (2006).
Development of the metacognitive skills of
prediction and evaluation in children with or
without math disability. Learning Disabilities
Research & Practice, 21(2), 77-88.
Hugues, M. (1996). Τα παιδιά και η έννοια των αριθ-
μών. Αθήνα: Gutenberg.
Kazi, S., Makris, N., & Demetriou, A. (2007). Selfawareness
and self-mapping of cognitive
processes from early childhood to adolescence.
In M. F. Shaughnessy & M. Vennemann (Eds.),
Metacognition (pp. 141-159). Hauppauge, NY:
Nova Sciences Publishers, Inc.
Καζή, Σ. (2008). Οι εκτιμήσεις της δυσκολίας των
Το σχήμα και ο αριθμός ως αναπαραστασιακά εργαλεία επίλυσης προβλημάτων 415
γνωστικών έργων από παιδιά προσχολικής και
σχολικής ηλικίας: Η επίδραση της εμπλοκής των
παιδιών στη διαδικασία επίλυσης των γνωστικών
έργων. Νόησις, 4, 75-101.
Levin, I., Wilkening, F., & Dembo, Y. (1984). Develop -
ment of time quantification: Integration and
nonintergration of beginnings and endings in
comparing duration. Child Development, 55,
-2172.
Madoglou, A. & Samartzi, S. (2004). The role of
conflict and information in the resolution of
problems of unfamiliar physics concepts.
Psychology, 11(1), 106-123.
Marini, Z. A. & Case, R. (1989). Parallels in the
development of preschoolers’ knowledge about
their physical and social words. Merrill-Palmer
Quarterly, 35, 63-88.
McKeough, A. (1992). A neo-Piagetian analysis of
narrative and its development. In R. Case (Ed.),
The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual
underpinnings of children’s thought and
knowledge (pp. 171-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Montangero, J. (1977). La notion de durée chez
l’enfant de 5 à 9 ans. Paris: PUF.
Montangero, J. (1985). The development of temporal
inferences and meanings in 5 to 8 year old
children. In J. A. Michon & J. L. Jackson (Eds.),
Time, Mind and Behaviour (pp. 279-287). Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
Piaget, J. (1946α). Le développement de la notion du
temps chez l’enfant. Paris: PUF.
Piaget, J. (1946β). Les notions de mouvement et de
la vitesse chez l’enfant. Paris: PUF.
Piaget, J. (1947). La psychologie de l`intelligence.
Paris: Armand Colin.
Piaget, J. (1957). Les notions de vitesse, d’espace
parcouru et de temps chez l’enfant de 5 ans.
Enfance, 1, 9-42.
Richie, D. M. & Bickhard, M. H. (1988). The ability to
perceive duration: its relation to the development
of the logical concept of time. Developmental
Psychology, 24, 318-323.
Roitman, J. D., Brannon, E. M., Andrews, J. R., &
Platt, M. L. (2007). Nonverbal representation of
time and number in adults. Acta Psychologica,
(3), 296-318.
Σαμαρτζή, Σ. (2003). Αντίληψη, Κατανόηση και Κα-
τασκευή του Χρόνου: Ψυχο-γνωσιακές προσεγ-
γίσεις. Αθήνα: Καστανιώτης.
Samartzi, S. (1992α). Time and inference rules in the
child, adolescent and adult. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas
& W. J. Friedman (Eds.), Time, Action and
Cognition: Towards Bridging the Gap (pp. 85-88).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Samartzi, S. (1992β). La notion du temps:
Développement des raisonnements (Tomes I et
II). Thèse de Doctorat. Paris: Université Paris VIII.
Samartzi, S. (1995). L’influence du nombre sur le
traitement des problèmes temporels. Journal
International de Psychologie, 30(2), 237-255.
Samartzi, S. & Pavlou, A. (2009). Children’s ideas
about time, distance and speed concepts: The
role of information presentation. Journal of
Science Education, 2(10), 87-90.
Siegler, R. S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive
development. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 481-520.
Siegler, R. S. (1981). Developmental sequences
within and between concepts. Monographs of
Society for Research in Child Development, 46
(Whole No. 189).
Siegler, R. S. (1987). Strategy choices in subtraction.
In J. Sloboda & D. Rogers (Eds.), Cognitive
processes in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process
of change in children’s thinking. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Siegler, R. S. (2002). Πώς σκέφτονται τα παιδιά. Αθή-
να: Gutenberg.
Siegler, R. S. & Alibali, M. W. (2004). Children’s
thinking, 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation,
selection, and cognitive change. In T. Simon &
G. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive
competence: New approaches to process
modelling. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stipek, D. & MacIver, D. (1989). Developmental
change in children’s assessment of intellectual
competence. Child Development, 60, 521-538.
Surber, C. F. & Gzesh, S. M. (1984). Reversible
operations in the balance scale task. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 254-74.
Ward, J. P. (2008). The Frog Who Croaked Blue.
London: Routledge.
