From reflective functioning to conspiracy thinking in the COVID-19 pandemic: Direct and indirect pathways
Published:
Apr 15, 2024
Keywords:
Reflective functioning, conspiracy thinking, COVID-19 pandemic, trust, perceived generalized threat, emotionality
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge of conspiracy theories that are used to explain this health crisis. Belief in these theories in turn has significant implications regarding adherence to scientifically based health measures and the seeking of appropriate medical treatment. However, the precursors of conspiracy thinking have not yet been fully understood. The current study investigated the direct and indirect effect of reflective functioning on conspiracy thinking through the role of generalized perceived threat of the virus, positive and negative emotions, trust in scientists, and trust in God in a sample of 1,730 adults in Greece. The results indicate that enhanced capacity for reflective functioning is associated with less likelihood of conspiracy theory endorsement. Higher levels of reflective functioning were associated with increased negative emotionality, lower levels of generalized perceived threat, greater trust in scientists, and less trust in God. Reflective functioning in and of itself did not predict conspiracy theory endorsement directly. Rather, this relationship was fully mediated by negative emotionality, generalized perceived threat, and higher levels of trust in scientists. These findings support recently proposed positions indicating that reflective functioning has a significant role in the framework of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Christopoulos, A., Pavlopoulos, V., Poulios, A., Karadimitri, K., Lagos, E., Stavrakaki, M., Stefanakou, E., Alexopoulou, K., Bekiari, A., Ktena, M., Panaritis, C., Risvas, C., Tsiodra, M., Pomini, V., & Gournellis, R. (2024). From reflective functioning to conspiracy thinking in the COVID-19 pandemic: Direct and indirect pathways . Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 29(1), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.31847
- Section
- RESEARCH PAPERS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
Downloads
References
Abaido, G. M., & Takshe, A. A. (2020). COVID-19: Virus or viral conspiracy theories. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 8(2), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2020.08.001252
Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
Allyn, B. (2020). Researchers: Nearly half of accounts tweeting about coronavirus are likely bots. NPR. Retrieved, May 20, 2020, from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/20/859814085/researchers-nearly-half-of-accounts-tweeting-about-coronavirus-are-likely-bots?t=1615317195341
Arslan, G., Yıldırım, M., Tanhan, A., Buluş, M., & Allen, K. A. (2020). Coronavirus stress, optimism-pessimism, psychological inflexibility, and psychological health: Psychometric properties of the Coronavirus Stress Measure. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00337-6
Asmundson, G. J., & Taylor, S. (2020). How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 71, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102211
Barron, D., Furnham, A., Weis, L., Morgan, K. D., Towell, T., & Swami, V. (2018). The relationship between schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs via cognitive processes. Psychiatry Research, 259, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.001
Biber, D. D., Melton, B., & Czech, D. R. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on college anxiety, optimism, gratitude, and course satisfaction. Journal of American College Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1842424
Biddlestone, M., Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID‐19. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 663-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12397
Bierwiaczonek, K., Kunst, J. R., & Pich, O. (2020). Belief in COVID‐19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 12, 1270-1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12223
Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. (2005). Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38(2), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126334-200502010-00014
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395 (10227), 912-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., Denovan, A., & Parton, M. (2015). Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206
Dein, S., Loewenthal, K., Lewis, C. A., & Pargament, K. I. (2020). COVID-19, mental health and religion: An agenda for future research. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1768725
Farias, J., & Pilati, R. (2021). COVID-19 as an undesirable political issue: Conspiracy beliefs and intolerance of uncertainty predict adhesion to prevention measures. Current Psychology, 1-11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01416-0
Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036505
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Jurist, E. L. (Eds.). (2018). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. Routledge.
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Moulton-Perkins, A., Lee, Y. W., Warren, F., Howard, S., Ghinai, R., Fearon, R., & Lowyck, B. (2016). Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The reflective functioning questionnaire. PLoS One, 11(7), Article e0158678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
Ford, C. L., Wallace, S. P., Newman, P. A., Lee, S. J., & Cunningham, W. E. (2013). Belief in AIDS-related conspiracy theories and mistrust in the government: relationship with HIV testing among at-risk older adults. The Gerontologist, 53(6), 973-984. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns192
Fountoulakis, K. N., Apostolidou, M. K., Atsiova, M. B., Filippidou, A. K., Florou, A. K., Gousiou, D. S., Katsara, E. I., Mantzari, S. N., Padouva-Markoulaki, M., Papatriantafyllou E. I., Sacharidi, P. I., Tonia, A. I., Tsagalidou, E. G., Zymara, V. P., Prezerakos, P. E., Koupidis S. A., Fountoulakis, N. K., & Chrousos, G. P. (2020). Self-reported changes in anxiety, depression and suicidality during the COVID-19 lockdown in Greece. Journal of Affective Disorders, 279, 624-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.061
Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., Jenner, L., , Teale, A-L., Carr, L., Mulhall, S., Bold E., & Lambe, S. (2020). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
Friedman, R. A. (2021). Why humans are vulnerable to conspiracy theories. Psychiatric Services, 72 (1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000348
Gates, B. (2020). Responding to Covid-19—a once-in-a-century pandemic? New England Journal of Medicine, 382 (18), 1677-1679. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2003762
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzan, R. (2019). Conspiracy beliefs in the general population: The importance of psychopathology, cognitive style and educational attainment. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109521
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzan, R. (2020). COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110201
Goertzel, T. (1994) Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology 15(4), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
Griva, F., Pomini, V., Gournellis, R., Doumos, G., Thomakos, P., & Vaslamatzis, G. (2020). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Greek version of Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Psychiatrike= Psychiatriki, 31(3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.216
Havey, N. F. (2020). Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation? Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020). A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1110-1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934692
Jolley, D., & Paterson, J. L. (2020). Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 628-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12394
Kranz, D., Niepel, C., Botes, E., & Greiff, S. (2020). Religiosity predicts unreasonable coping with COVID-19. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000395
Lassri, D., & Desatnik, A. (2020). Losing and regaining reflective functioning in the times of COVID-19: Clinical risks and opportunities from a mentalizing approach. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S38. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000760
Latkin, C. A., Dayton, L., Moran, M., Strickland, J. C., & Collins, K. (2021). Behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with COVID-19 skepticism in the United States. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01211-3
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS one, 8(10), Article e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134773
Lithopoulos, A., Liu, S., Zhang, C. Q., & Rhodes, R. E. (2021). Predicting physical distancing in the context of COVID-19: A test of the extended parallel process model among Canadian adults. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000270
Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., & Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355
Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2018). The stress–reward–mentalizing model of depression: An integrative developmental cascade approach to child and adolescent depressive disorder based on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 64, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.008
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2308
Miller, J. M. (2020). Psychological, political, and situational factors combine to boost COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 53(2), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842392000058X
Newheiser, A. K., Farias, M., & Tausch, N. (2011). The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1007-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.011
Nolte, T., Guiney, J., Fonagy, P., Mayes, L. C., & Luyten, P. (2011). Interpersonal stress regulation and the development of anxiety disorders: an attachment-based developmental framework. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00055
Olagoke, A. A., Olagoke, O. O., & Hughes, A. M. (2020). Intention to vaccinate against the novel 2019 coronavirus disease: The role of health locus of control and religiosity. Journal of Religion and Health, 60, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01090-9
Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. (2014). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(5), 817-818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.190
Park, T., Ju, I., Ohs, J. E., & Hinsley, A. (2021). Optimistic bias and preventive behavioral engagement in the context of COVID-19. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(1), 1859-1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.004
Pavela Banai, I., Banai, B., & Mikloušić, I. (2020). Beliefs in COVID‐19 conspiracy theories predict lower levels of compliance with the preventive measures both directly and indirectly by lowering trust in government medical officials. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29313.89443
Pavlopoulos, V., Christopoulos, A., Poulios, A., Alexopoulou, E., Bekiari, A., Ktena, M., Panaritis, C., Risvas, C., Tsiorda M., Karadimitri, K., Lagos, E., Stavrakaki, M., & Stefanakou, E. (2021). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Predicting adherence to quarantine and endorsement of scientifically informed policies in the COVID-19 Pandemic [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
Plohl, N., & Musil, B. (2021). Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
Poulios, A., Pavlopoulos, V., Tsiodra, M., Stefanakou, E., Stavrakaki, M., Risvas, C., Panaritis, C., Lagos, E., Ktena, M., Karadimitri, K., Bekiari, A., Alexopoulou, K., Pomini, V., Gournellis, R., & Ginieri-Coccosis, M. (2021). COVID-19 and Quality of Life: The Role of Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Factors. Psychology, 12, 1506 – 1528. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.1210095
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rees, J., & Lamberty, P. (2019). Mitreißende Wahrheiten: Verschwörungsmythen als Gefahr für den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt. In A. Zick, B. Küpper, & W. Berghan (Eds.), Verlorene Mitte - Feindselige Zustände. Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2018/19 (pp. 203-222). Dietz.
Reizer, A., Geffen, L., & Koslowsky, M. (2021). Life under the COVID-19 lockdown: On the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and psychological distress. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001012
Robinson, P., Skårderud, F., & Sommerfeldt, B. (2019). Eating disorders and mentalizing. In Robinson, P., Skårderud, F., & Sommerfeldt, B. (Eds.), Hunger: Mentalization-based treatments for eating disorders. (pp. 35-49). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95121-8_3
Sadeghiyeh, H., Khanahmadi, I., Farhadbeigi, P., & Karimi, N. (2020). Cognitive reflection and the coronavirus conspiracy beliefs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p9wxj
Sánchez-Teruel, D., & Robles-Bello, M. A. (2020). Predictive variables of resilience in young Moroccan immigrant. Current Psychology, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01126-z
Setbon, M., & Raude, J. (2010). Factors in vaccination intention against the pandemic influenza A/H1N1. European Journal of Public Health, 20(5), 490-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq054
Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Wang, T., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 279-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5
Sheetal, A., Feng, Z., & Savani, K. (2020). Using Machine Learning to Generate Novel Hypotheses: Increasing Optimism About COVID-19 Makes People Less Willing to Justify Unethical Behaviors. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1222-1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620959594
Steele, H. (2020). COVID-19, fear and the future: An attachment perspective. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 97-99. htps://doi.org/10.36131/ CN20200213
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2020). Analytic thinking, rejection of coronavirus (COVID-19) conspiracy theories, and compliance with mandated social-distancing: Direct and indirect relationships in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/nmx9w
Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2014). 12 Political paranoia and conspiracy theories. Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders. (pp. 218-236). Cambridge University Press.
Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M., & Žeželj, I. (2020). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770
Van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530
Weir, K. (2020). Grief and COVID-19: Mourning our bygone lives. American Psychological Association. Retrieved January 2, 2021, from https://www.apa.org/news/apa/2020/04/grief-covid-19
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
