Analysing networks: from typologies of institutions to narratives of beliefs
Abstract
In an 1992 article, Rod Rhodes and David Marsh reviewed the existing British and other European literature on policy networks. Since then, there has been a massive outpouring of material and a vigorous debate. This paper updates the story by asking ‘where are we now’ and ‘where are we going’? In the next (second) section of the article the authors summarise current approaches to the study of networks and the attendant debate. In the third section they argue that these approaches are characterised by: the assumption that networks are given facts from which you can read off individual beliefs and actions; a focus on routines, not change; a tendency to build elaborate typologies; and an emphasis on managing networks. In the fourth section, the authors propose an alternative approach rooted in an anti-foundational epistemology. They suggest the notions of tradition and narrative should be central to understanding networks.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. (2015). Analysing networks: from typologies of institutions to narratives of beliefs. Science and Society: Journal of Political and Moral Theory, 10, 21–56. https://doi.org/10.12681/sas.698
- Section
- Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work, not for commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.