Conspiracy theories before and after the Greek crisis: Discursive patterns and political use of the “enemy” theme
Abstract
Conspiracy theories have been associated to a paranoid way of thinking; however they are not always marginal and utterly irrational. Conspiracist narratives reflect rival strategies of interpretation, and can have a real impact on the social and political praxis. More than factual accuracy, I suggest that what distinguishes a conspiracy theory is a type of discourse, its key features being: suspicion, intentionality, personification, speculation and denunciation.
This paper examines conspiracy theories that dominated Greek public discourse before and after the economic crisis of the years 2010s, particularly those introduced by political actors as a means of political persuasion and mobilisation. Greek political culture and the discredit of the political system since 2010 led to frequent expressions of distrust towards political elites and foreign “powers”. My analysis focuses on the acceptability of conspiracy theories in relation with social representations, dominant stereotypes and widely shared interpretative schemata.
The following cases of conspiracy theories are discussed: a) the wildfires that ravaged large parts of Greece in 2007, supposedly set by “foreign agents”; b) the alleged assassination plot in 2008-2009 against the PM Karamanlis by Western / US secret services; c) the conspiracy theories attributing the economic crisis to a deliberate foreign plot against Greece. The paper examines in particular the attribution of blame to presumed “enemies”, in line with nationalist discursive themes and stereotypes.Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Skoulariki, A. (2018). Conspiracy theories before and after the Greek crisis: Discursive patterns and political use of the “enemy” theme. Science and Society: Journal of Political and Moral Theory, 37, 73–108. https://doi.org/10.12681/sas.14656
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work, not for commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Antoniou G., Dinas E., Kosmidis Sp. (2015). “Collective Victimhood and Social Prejudice. A Post-Holocaust Theory of anti-Semitism”. (Working paper) Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285236109 (retrieved 6 November 2016)
Bakalaki, A. (2016). “Chemicals, Crisis and Loss in an Interconnected World”. Visual Anthropology, 32 (1): 12-23. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/var.12089/full (retrieved 7 March 2017)
Bakalaki, A. (2014). “«Μας ψεκάζουν», «Θα μας πεθάνουν», «Μας έχουν πεθάνει»: Αποκρίσεις στις κρίσεις των καιρών”. Σύγχρονα Θέματα, 124: 33-41.
Bale, J. M. (2007). “Political paranoia v. political realism: on distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics”. Patterns of Prejudice, 41 (1): 45-60.
Barkun, M. (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bithymitris G., Lialiouti Z. (2017). “A nation under attack: perceptions of enmity and victimhood in the context of the Greek crisis”. National Identities, 19 (1): 53-71.
Bonnafous S., Krieg-Planque A. (2013). “L’analyse du discours”. In St. Olivesi ed., Sciences de l’information et de la communication. Objets, savoirs, discipline, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble: 223-238.
Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Charaudeau P., Maingueneau D., eds (2002). Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours. Paris: Seuil.
Couloumbis Th., Petropoulos J., Psomiadis H. (1976). Foreign Interference in Greek Politics: An Historical Perspective. New York: Pella.
Eco, U. (2012). The Prague Cemetery. London: Vintage Books.
Emke, I. (2000). “Agents and Structures: Journalists and the Constraints on AIDS Coverage”. Canadian Journal of Communication, 25 (3). http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1162/1081 (retrieved 7 June 2016)
Entman R. (1993). “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”. Journal of Communication, 43 (4): 51-58.
Frangoudaki A., Dragona Th., eds (1997). «Τι ειν’η πατρίδα μας;» Εθνοκεντρισμός στην εκπαίδευση. Athens: Alexandreia.
Gamson W., Croteau D., Hoynes W., Sasson Th. (1992). “Media images and the social construction of reality”. Annual Review of Sociology, 18: 373-393.
Gamson W., Modigliani A. (1989). “Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach”. American Journal of Sociology, 95 (1): 1-37.
Georgiadou, V. (2015). “Από την Εθνική Παράταξη και τον ΛΑ.Ο.Σ. στη Χρυσή Αυγή και τους ΑΝ.ΕΛ. Παλιές και νέες πολιτικές ευκαιρίες για την άνοδο της Άκρας Δεξιάς”. Athens Review of Books 64, July.
Georgiadou V., Kafe A., Nezi S, Pieridis C. (2017). “Plebiscitarian spirit in the square: key characteristics of the Greek Indignants”. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-017-9272-8
Georgiadou V., Rori L. (2013). “Economic crisis, social and political impact. The new right-wing extremism in Greece”. In J. Pastor, N. Rojas Pedemonte, eds, Anuari del Conflicte Social 2013: 322-339.
Ginzburg, C. (2012). Threads and Traces. True False Fictive. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Glick, P. (2005). “Choice of Scapegoats”. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, L. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport. Oxford: Blackwell: 244–261.
Hofstadter, R. (1996 [1965]). The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Iliadeli, A. (2010). Ο συνωμοσιολογικός λόγος στο ελληνικό πολιτικό σύστημα: Οι πυρκαγιές του 2007, η διεθνής χρηματοπιστωτική κρίση και η λέσχη Μπίλντερμπεργκ. Master’s thesis, University of Thessaloniki. http://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/124180/files/liad.pdf (retrieved 7 August 2017)
Ioannidou, A. (2013). “Ο νέος ελληνικός εθνικισμός. Η «κακιά» Ευρώπη, η «φίλη» Ρωσία” και η ξεχασμένη Αμερική. Foreign Affairs, The Hellenic edition, 12 July. http://www.foreignaffairs.gr/articles/69389/aleksandra-ioannidoy/o-neos-ellinikos-ethnikismos?page=show (retrieved 10 September 2017)
Komninou, M. ed. (2017). Δημόσια σφαίρα σε κρίση. Πώς και γιατί παραβιάζεται η δεοντολογία στα ΜΜΕ (2009-2016). Athens: Papazisis.
Moffitt, B. (2015). “How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism”. Government and Opposition, 50 (2): 189–217.
Moscovici, S. (1987). “The conspiracy mentality”. In C. F. Graumann, S. Moscovici, eds. Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. New York: Springer Verlag: 151-169.
Lialiouti, Z. (2016). Ο αντι-αμερικανισμός στην Ελλάδα 1947-1989. Athens: Asini.
Pantazopoulos, A. (2015). “Πρόλογος. Αντιστασιακή συνωμοσιολογία”. In P-A. Taguieff. Συνωμοσιολογική σκέψη και θεωρίες συνωμοσίας. Thessaloniki: Epikentro: 9-22.
Papachelas, A. (1998). Ο Βιασμός της Ελληνικής Δημοκρατίας. Ο Αμερικανικός παράγων, 1947-1967. Athens: Estia.
Pleios, G., ed. (2013). Η κρίση και τα ΜΜΕ. Athens: Papazisis.
Poulakidakos, St. (2014). “Όψεις της ελληνικής αμυντικής κοινωνίας στον τηλεοπτικό ενημερωτικό λόγο τον καιρό της οικονομικής κρίσης”. Επιστήμη και Κοινωνία, 31: 121-152.
Psarras, D. (2012). Η Μαύρη Βίβλος της Χρυσής Αυγής. Athens: Polis.
Sevastakis N., Stavrakakis Y. (2012). Λαϊκισμός, αντιλαϊκισμός και κρίση. Athens: Nefeli.
Skoulariki, A. (2007a). “Ο εμπρησμός της ενημέρωσης. Σκέψεις για τη δημοκρατία των τηλεδιαξιφισμών και της συνωμοσιολογίας”. Σύγχρονα Θέματα, 98: 74-76.
Skoulariki, A. (2007b) “Ο δημόσιος λόγος για το έθνος με αφορμή το Μακεδονικό (1991-1995): πλαίσιο, αναπαραστάσεις και ΜΜΕ”. In M. Kontochristou, ed., Ταυτότητα και Μέσα Μαζικής Επικοινωνίας στη σύγχρονη Ελλάδα. Athens: Papazisis: 61-103.
Skoulariki, A. (2005). “Au nom de la nation. Le discours public en Grèce sur la question macédonienne et le rôle des médias (1991-1995)”. PhD thesis. University of Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas.
Stavrakakis Y., Katsambekis G., Kioupkiolis A., Nikisianis N., Siomos Th. (2017). “Populism, anti-populism and crisis”. Contemporary Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0142-y
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Taguieff, P.-A. (2013). Court traité de complotologie. Paris: Fayard.
Taguieff, P.-A. (2015). Pensée conspirationniste et « théories du complot ». Une introduction critique. Paris: UPPR; (In Greek:) Συνωμοσιολογική σκέψη και «Θεωρίες της συνωμοσίας». Τhessaloniki: Epikentro.
Vamvakas V. (2014). Ο λόγος της κρίσης. Πόλωση, βία και αναστοχασμός στην πολιτική και δημοφιλή κουλτούρα. Thessaloniki: Epikentro.
Van Prooijen J.-W, Krouwel A. P. M., Pollet Th. V. (2015). “Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories”. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6 (5): 570-578. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271714033_Political_Extremism_Predicts_Belief_in_Conspiracy_Theories (retrieved 20 September 2017).
Whitson J., Galinsky A. (2008). “Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception”. Science, 322 (5898): 115-117.
Wodak R., Meyer M. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Zarali K., Frangonikolopoulos Ch. (2013), “Οικονομική κρίση και «εθνικός εαυτός». Η περίπτωση των ελληνικών newsportals και blogs”. In G. Pleios, ed. Η κρίση και τα ΜΜΕ. Athens: Papazisis: 271-312.
