The weakness of the neo-institutionalist approaches: how political institutions change
Abstract
What rational choice, sociological and historical neo-institutionalist approaches have in common is the importance they attribute to the study of institutions. Institutions exert autonomous influence upon individual behaviour and thereby affect political outcomes. Where the three approaches differ is in the answers they provide to three key questions: What could be considered an institution? How do institutions affect individual action? How are institutions created, why do they persist and what brings about institutional change? By and large, the greatest weakness of all neo-institutionalist approaches is their difficulty to account for institutional creation and change. What is argued here is that historical institutionalism is best equipped to deal with institutional dynamics and has been more successful in doing so compared to rational choice and sociological neo-institutionalism.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Τσακατίκα Μ. (2015). The weakness of the neo-institutionalist approaches: how political institutions change. Science and Society: Journal of Political and Moral Theory, 13, 135–166. https://doi.org/10.12681/sas.580
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work, not for commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
