Can performance measurement and budgeting help the governance process?
Abstract
How can the organization of society be improved? As would be argued in this paper understanding ‘governance’ and moving from ‘governing’ to ‘governance’ is one way of doing it. Governing has to do with control, while governance has to do with steering. Governing is the sole prerogative of governments because it involves the possible use of coercion while governance involves cooperation and collaboration among multiple governmental and non-governmental actors with diverse economic and non-economic interests. The thesis of this paper is that if the notion of governance evolved as an attempt of societies to overcome institutional and structural limitations of governments to deal with many problems, maximizing its potential benefits and minimizing its dysfunctions may depend on free flow of quality data and information. The introduction and public dissemination of regular performance reports about government operations is important for facilitating free flow of information and quality data. If for no other reason, free flow of data and information about government is important because it sets an example for other participants (and would be participants) in the governance process. As other participants in the governance process make quality data and information about themselves available, the governance process may become more efficient, making its societal benefits more readily available.
The paper starts by reviewing the way donor institutions like the UN, World Bank or the IMF view the notion of governance, followed by a similar look at the perspectives offered by some scholars. The paper goes on to examine how performance measurement, as a tool for accountability can facilitate the free flow of information and thus, cooperation. The paper concludes that performance reporting and the recent introduction of performance budgets (associating the allocation of resources not only with ends but with the cost of attaining them) can foster the governance process.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Halachmi, A. (2015). Can performance measurement and budgeting help the governance process?. Science and Society: Journal of Political and Moral Theory, 10, 109–141. https://doi.org/10.12681/sas.701
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work, not for commercial purposes, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).