Οι ταμπλέτες στην εκπαίδευση. Αποτελέσματα από πιλοτικό πρόγραμμα για τη διδασκαλία συστημάτων του ανθρώπινου οργανισμού σε μαθητές δημοτικού

PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: Ιουλ 12, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/hjre.13811
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
tablets κινητές εφαρμογές επαυξημένη πραγματικότητα αναπνευστικό σύστημα κυκλοφορικό σύστημα
Αικατερίνη Μαστροκούκου
Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-1447
Εμμανουήλ Φωκίδης
Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-0314
Περίληψη

Η εργασία αφορά τη χρήση εφαρμογής για tablets για τη διδασκαλία των συστημάτων του ανθρώπινου οργανισμού. Σκοπός ήταν να διερευνηθεί κατά πόσο μια εφαρμογή με τρισδιάστατες απεικονίσεις και στοιχεία επαυξημένης πραγματικότητας μπορεί να βοηθήσει στην καλύτερη κατανόηση από τους μαθητές του τρόπου λειτουργίας του αναπνευστικού και κυκλοφορικού συστήματος και του τρόπου με τον οποίο αυτά συνεργάζονται. Για το σκοπό αυτό, οργανώθηκαν δύο ομάδες μαθητών της Στ’ Δημοτικού, οι οποίοι διδάχθηκαν το ίδιο αντικείμενο με δύο διαφορετικούς τρόπους διδασκαλίας. Στην πρώτη ομάδα εφαρμόστηκε ομαδοσυνεργατική διδασκαλία, η οποία ενισχύθηκε, σε κάποιο βαθμό, τεχνολογικά, ενώ η δεύτερη ομάδα χρησιμοποίησε αποκλειστικά και μόνο tablets. Οι διδακτικές παρεμβάσεις διήρκησαν η κάθε μία τέσσερα διδακτικά δίωρα. Στην έρευνα συμμετείχαν συνολικά 50 μαθητές. Η συλλογή των δεδομένων πραγματοποιήθηκε με τη χρήση φύλλων αξιολόγησης και ερωτηματολογίου. Τα αποτελέσματα έδειξαν ότι η ομάδα που χρησιμοποίησε τα tablets είχε καλύτερες επιδόσεις σε σχέση με την άλλη ομάδα. Η έρευνα ανέδειξε τη θετική επίδραση που είχαν τα tablets στις επιδόσεις των μαθητών, ενώ φάνηκε και η θετική στάση των μαθητών απέναντι στη χρήση τους στη διδασκαλία. 

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού – Μη Εμπορική Χρήση – Παρόμοια Διανομή 4.0.

Τα πνευματικά δικαιώματα των άρθρων του περιοδικού ανήκουν στους συγγραφείς. Τα άρθρα διατίθενται με άδειες Creative Commons CC-BC-SA 4.0

 
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Βιογραφικά Συγγραφέων
Αικατερίνη Μαστροκούκου, Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου
Εκπαιδευτικός
Εμμανουήλ Φωκίδης, Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου
Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα Δημοτικής Εκπαίδευσης, Λέκτορας
Αναφορές
Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in primary science. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Al-Mashaqbeh, I., & Al Shurman, M. (2015). The adoption of tablet and e-textbooks: first grade core curriculum and school administration attitude. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 188-194.
Alyahya, S., & Gall, J. E. (2012). iPads in education: A qualitative study of students’ attitudes and experiences. In T. Amiel, & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2012 (pp. 1266-1271). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. (2006). An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(3), 270-283.
Arnaudin, M. W., & Mintzes, J. J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross-age study. Science Education, 69(5), 721-733.
Bidin, S., & Ziden, A. A. (2013). Adoption and application of mobile learning in the education industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 720-729.
Billinghurst, M., & Dünser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63.
Bonds-Raacke, J. M., & Raacke, J. D. (2008). Using tablet PCs in the classroom: an investigation of students’ expectations and reactions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(3).
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895-935.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scatter, P., Carlson-Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). BSCS SE instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. A report prepared for the Office of Science Education, National Institutes of Health. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Chi, M. T. H., Chiu, M., & DeLeeuw, N. (1991). Learning in a non-physical science domain: The human circulatory system. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center.
Churchill, D., & Wang, T. (2014). Teacher’s use of iPads in higher education. Educational Media International, 51(3), 214-225.
Clarke, B., & Svanaes, S. (2014). Tablets for schools: an updated literature review on the use of tablets in education. Retrieved from Family Kids & Youth website: http://maneele.drealentejo.pt/site/images/Literature-Review-Use-of-Tablets-in-Education-9-4-14.pdf
Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: Α step-by-step approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: a systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 149-160.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13(1), 105-122.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2014). Implementing tablet PCs in schools: students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40-46.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
Ferdousi, B., & Bari, J. (2015). Infusing mobile learning into undergraduate courses for effective learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 307-311.
FitzGerald, E., Taylor, C., & Craven, M. (2013). To the Castle! A comparison of two audio guides to enable public discovery of historical events. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(4), 749-760.
Fokides, E., & Atsikpasi, P. (2016). Tablets in education. Result from the initiative ETiE for teaching plants to primary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 1-19.
Furió, D., Juan, M-C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189-201.
Garcia-Barros, S., Martínez-Losada, C., & Garrido, M. (2011). What do children aged four to seven know about the digestive system and the respiratory system of the human being and of other animals? International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2095-2122.
Gatt, S., & Saliba, M. (2006). Young children’s ideas about the heart. In M. F. Costa, & B. V. Dorrío (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Hands-on Science. Science Education and Sustainable Development, (pp. 17-23).
Görhan, M. F., Öncü, S., & Şentük, A. (2014). Tablets in education: Outcome expectancy and anxiety of middle school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(6), 2259-2271.
Hahn, J., & Bussell, H. (2012). Curricular use of the iPad 2 by a first-year undergraduate learning community. Library Technology Reports, 48(8), 42-47.
Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2014). The teaching of science in primary schools (6th ed.). Routledge.
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2015). Tablet use in schools: a critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156.
Hmelo. C. E., Holton, D. L., Allen, J. K., & Kolodner, J, L. (1997). Designing for understanding: children’s lung models. In M. G. Shafto, & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 313-318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hsu, Y-C., & Ching, Y-H. (2013). Mobile computer-supported collaborative learning: a review of experimental research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E111-E114.
Hwang, G-J., & Tsai, C-C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2010 to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65-E70.
Kalinic, Z., Arsovski, S., Stefanovic, M., Arsovski, Z., & Rancovic, V. (2011). The development of a mobile learning application as support for a blended e-learning environment. Technics Technologies Education Management, 6(4), 1345-1355.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1).
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297-302.
Kinash, S., Brand, J., & Mathew, T. (2012). Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: Student perceptions of blackboard mobile learn and iPads. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 639-655.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives – the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.
Mang, C. F., & Wardley, L. J. (2013). Student perceptions of using tablet technology in post-secondary classes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(4), 1-16.
Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76-85.
Mintzes, J. J. (1984). Naïve theories in biology: Children’s concepts of the human body. School Science and Mathematics, 84(7), 548-555.
Murphy, G. D. (2011). Post-PC devices: A summary of early iPad technology adoption in tertiary environments. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 5(1), 18-32.
Nagy, M. H. (1953). Children’s conceptions of some bodily functions. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83(2), 199-216.
Ozdamli, F. (2012). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 927-931.
Özgür, S. (2013). The persistence of misconceptions about the human blood circulatory system among students in different grade levels. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(2), 255-268.
Pengcheng, F., Mingquan, Z., & Xuesong, W. (2011). The significance and effectiveness of augmented reality in experimental education. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 895-898). Red Hook, NY: IEEE.
Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research on Science Education, 31(3), 383-399.
Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1-26.
Şad, S. N., & Göktaş, Ö. (2014). Preservice teachers’ perceptions about using mobile phones and laptops in education as mobile learning tools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 606-618.
Sattler, B., Spyridakis, I., Dalal, N., & Ramey, J. (2010). The learning experience: A literature review of the role of mobile technology. 2010 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 38-45).
Schmitz, B., Specht, M., & Klemke, P. (2012). An analysis of the educational potential of augmented reality games for learning. In M. Specht, J. Multisilta, & M. Sharples (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning 2012 (pp. 140-147).
Sharples, M., & Roschelle, J. (2010). Guest editorial: Special issue on mobile and ubiquitous technologies for learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(1), 4-6.
Siegel, S., & Castellan Jr, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York, ΝΥ: McGraw-Hill.
Sloan, R. H. (2012). Using an e-textbook and iPad: results of a pilot program. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41(1), 87-104.
Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Dimensions of mobile augmented reality for learning: a first inventory. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), 117-127.
Sun, D., Looi, C-K., Wu, L., & Xie, W. (2016). The innovative immersion of mobile learning into a science curriculum in Singapore: an exploratory study. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 547-573.
Tracana, R. B., Varanda, I., Viveiros, S., & Carvalho, G. S. (2012). Children’s conceptions about respiration before and after formal teaching: identification of learning obstacles. Proceedings of the XV IOSTE Symposium (International Organization for Science and Technology Education)-The use of Science and Technology Education for Peace and Sustainable Development, 1-11.
van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20.
Wilkinson, K., & Barter, P. (2016). Do mobile learning devices enhance learning in higher education anatomy classrooms? Journal of Pedagogic Development, 6(1), 14-23.
Windschitl, M. A. (1995). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: the roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations (Paper 15946). Retrieved from: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=16945&context=rtd
Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3), 293-308.
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers and Education, 94, 1-17.
Τα περισσότερο διαβασμένα άρθρα του ίδιου συγγραφέα(s)