Therapeutic relationship: dynamic interactions and the role of gender

PDF (ελληνικά)
Published: Jun 7, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.26863
Keywords:
gender psychotherapeutic relationship therapeutic interaction
Christina Athanasiades
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-9328
Abstract

The article emphasizes, first of all, the importance of various aspects of the psychotherapeutic relationship -such as the therapeutic alliance, the cooperation, the empathy, the goal agreement-, which have been proven to influence the therapeutic outcome and are consistently linked with the mental health improvement of the patient, regardless of the different theoretical conditions and principles of the psychotherapeutic approaches. On the other hand, it is recognized that identifying the quality characteristics that contribute to and influence the psychotherapeutic relationship and process is a difficult task, as it depends on the therapeutic boundaries of this relationship, the characteristics of the therapist, but also on factors related with the patient, such as his/her attitudes, expectations, motivations and commitment to a process of change. One element that seems to characterize the identity of each member individually, but also the dynamic processes of interaction between the therapeutic dyad, is gender. For this reason, the article underlines the importance of gender in shaping the communication and cooperation between therapists and patients, while stating also that awareness of the gender dynamics, in combination with other identity characteristics, is a prerequisite for an effective and ethical practice.

Article Details
  • Section
  • SPECIAL SECTION
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Christina Athanasiades, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
School of Psychology
References
Ardito, R. B., & Rabellino, D (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical escursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00270
Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2007). Is who delivers the treatment mor important than the treatment itself? The role of the therapist in common factors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(3), 298-317.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00029.x
Bohart, A. C. (2000). The client is the most important common factor: Clients’ self-healing capacities and psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10(2), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.1023 /A:1009444132104
Bohart, A. C., & Tallman, A. K. (2010). Clients: The neglected common factor in psychotherapy. In Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Wampold, B. E., & Hubble, M. A. (Eds) The Heart & Soul of Change. Delivering What Works in Therapy, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/12075-003
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885
Brown, J. (2015). Specific techniques vs. common factors? Psychotherapy integration and its role in ethical practice. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 69(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy. 2015.69.3.301
Cooper, M. (2005). Therapists’ experiences of relational depth: A qualitative interview study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5(2), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690500211130
Cooper, M. (2013). Experiencing relational depth in therapy: What we know so far. In Knox, R., Murphy, D., Wiggins, S., & Cooper, M. (Eds.) Relational Depth. New perspectives and developments (pp. 62-76). Hampshire. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29831-7_6
European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) (2020). Μετα-Κώδικας Ηθικής. Αναρτήθηκε στις 12 Μαΐου από http://www.seps.gr/index.php/efpa
Gelso, C. (2014). A tripartite model of the therapeutic relationship: Theory, research and practice. Psychotherapy Research, 24(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.845920
Gehart, D. R., & Lyle, R. R. (2001). Client experience of gender in therapeutic relationships: An interpetatove ethnography. Family Process, 40(4), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2001.4040100443.x
Horvath, A. O. (2005). The therapeutic relationship: Research and theory. Psychotherapy Research, 15(1-2), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300512331339143
Horvath, A. O., Fluckiger, C., Del Re A. C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022186
Horvath A. O., Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 561-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.561
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/00220167.38 .2.139
Karver, M. S., Handelsman, J. B., Fields, S., & Bickman, L. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutice relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cpr.2005.09.001
Kastrani, Th., Deliyanni-Kouimtzi, V., & Athanasiades, C. (2014). Greek female clients’ experience of the gendered therapeutic relationship: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-014-9227-y
Kastrani, Th., Deliyanni-Kouimtzis, V., & Athanasiades, C. (2017). Women as counselling and psychotherapy clients: Reseraching the therapeutic relationship. The European Joyrnal of Counselling Psychology, 6(1), 138-161. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v6i1.130
Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357
Norcross, J. C. (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.001.0001
Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2018). Psychotherapy relationships that work III. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000193
Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2011).Evidence-based therapy relationships: Research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 98-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022161
Pikus, C. F., & Heavy, C. L. (1996). Client preferences for therapist gender. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 10(4), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J035v10n04_05
Snell Jr., W. E., Hampton, B. R., & McManus, P. (1992). The impact of counselor and participant gender on willingness to discuss relational topics: Development of the Relationship Disclosure Scale. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(3), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01625.x
Speight, S. L., & Vera, E. M. (2005). University counseling center clients’ expressed preferences for counselors: A four year archival exploration. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 19(3), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J035v19n03_06
Σύλλογος Ελλήνων Ψυχολόγων (ΣΕΨ) (2020). Κώδικας Δεοντολογίας. Αναρτήθηκε στις 12 Μαΐου από http://www.seps.gr/index.php/2010-02-22-13-47-11
Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238
Wiggins, S., Elliott, R., & Cooper, M. (2012). The prevalence and characteristics of relational depth events in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy research, 22(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.629635
Wilhelmsson Gostas, M., Wiberg, B., Neander, K., & Kjellin, L. (2011). ‘Hard work’ in a new context: Clients’ experiences of psychotherapy. Qualitative Social Work, 0(00), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1473325011431649
Wintersteen, M. B., Mensinger, J. L., & Diamond, G. S. (2005). Do gender and racial differences between patient and therapist affect therapeutic alliance and treatment retention in adolescents? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(4), 400-408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.4.400
Yalom, I., (2012). Love’s executioner: and other tales of psychotherapy. Basic Books.
Most read articles by the same author(s)