Transformative learning theory, theoretical field or metatheory?


Alexis Kokkos
Abstract



In the present response to the journal’s survey, I mainly discuss the present state of affairs of the transformative learning (TL) theoretical framework. I argue that, on the one hand, various theoretical contributions have significantly expanded and enriched Jack Mezirow’s initial conceptualization. On the other hand, the ever-increasing theoretical views led to the fragmentation of the theoretical field and to uncertainty as regards its components and terminology. Accordingly, I claim that a collective metatheoretical work that should attempt to seek for points of agreement and synthesize the various perspectives might favor the development of a more integrated TL theoretical framework.




Article Details
  • Sezione
  • Articles
Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Aalsburg – Wiessner, C., & Mezirow, J. (2000). Theory building and the search for common ground. In J. Mezirow& Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 329-357). Jossey-Bass.
Cranton, P., & Taylor, E.W. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In E.W. Taylor, P. Cranton, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp.3-30). Jossey-Bass.
Dirkx, J., Mezirow, J, & Cranton, P. (2006). Musings and reflections on the meaning, context, and process of transformative learning: A dialogue between John Dirkx and Jack Mezirow. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(2), 123-139.
Dirkx, J. (2012a). Self-formation and transformative learning: A response to “calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts” by Michel Newman. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(4), 399-405.
Dirkx, J. (2012b). Nurturing soul work: A Jungian approach to transformative learning. In E.W. Taylor, P. Cranton, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 116-130). Jossey-Bass.
Gunnlaugson, O. (2008). Metatheoretical prospects for the field of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 6 (2), 124-135.
Hoggan, C. (2016). Transformative learning as a metatheory: Definition, criteria, and typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 66 (1), 57-75.
Hoggan, C. (2018). The current state of transformative learning theory: A metatheory. Pronesis, 7 (3), 18-25.
Hoggan, C., & Finnegan, F. (2023). Transformative learning theory: Where we are going after 45 years. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2023, 5-11.
Hoggan, C., & Higgins, K. (2023). Understanding transformative learning through metatheory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2023, 13-23.
Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. Routledge.
Kokkos, A. (2020). Introduction. In A. Kokkos (Ed.), Expanding Transformation Theory: Affinities between Jack Mezirow and emancipatory educationalists (pp. 1-23).
Routledge.
Mezirow, J. (1978). Perspective Transformation. Adult Education Quarterly, 28(2), 100-
Mezirow, J., & Associates (Eds.) (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical
perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
Nicolaides, A., & Eschenbacher, S. (2022). The many turns of transformation: Creating
new vocabularies for transformative learning. In A. Nicolaides et al (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of learning for transformation (pp. 1-22). Palgrave Macmillan.
Puoi leggere altri articoli dello stesso autore/i