Probing the relation between Theory of Mind and Epistemic Beliefs
Published:
Oct 15, 2020
Keywords:
Theory of Mind Personal Epistemology
Abstract
The present research investigated a) beliefs about the mind of others elementary school children’s (Theory of Mind), b) their epistemic beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing (Personal Epistemology), and c) the relationship between these two domains, in order to examine the hypothesis that Theory of Mind is a first step towards the development of a Personal Epistemology. Forty-six fifth graders were administered measures of their ability to attribute false beliefs to others and of their epistemic stance. The results showed statistically significant
correlations between children’s ability to understand the beliefs of others and their epistemic beliefs. Furthermore, students performed better on Theory of Mind measures in relation to epistemic measures indicating that children more readily understand the constructivist nature of knowledge in the domain of Theory of Mind. The regression analyses carried out showed that Theory of Mind highly contributes to children’s epistemic stance.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Κυριακοπούλου Ν., & Βοσνιάδου Σ. (2020). Probing the relation between Theory of Mind and Epistemic Beliefs. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 18(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23714
- Issue
- Vol. 18 No. 2 (2011)
- Section
- RESEARCH PAPERS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal PSYCHOLOGY adopts a Platinum open-access policy. Submission, processing or publication costs are waived by the Hellenic Psychological Society. Papers published in the journal PSYCHOLOGY are licensed under a 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International' licence. The authors reserve the copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of its first publication. Third-party licensees are allowed to use the published paper immediately after publication as they wish, provided they retain the defined by the license copyright formalities, regarding the reference to its author(s) and its initial publication in the journal PSYCHOLOGY. Moreover, any adjusted work should be shared under the same reuse rights, so with the same CC license.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alexander, P. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (2007). First steps:
Scholars’ promising movements into a nascent
field of inquiry. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas & X.
Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual
change approach in learning and instruction.
Oxford: Elsevier.
Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L., & Olson, D. R. (1988).
De veloping Theories of Mind. Cam bridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Astington, J. W. & Pelletier, J. (1998). The language
of mind: Its role in teaching and learning. In D. R.
Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of
education and human development (pp. 593–
. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Astington, J. W., Pelletier, J., & Homer, B. (2002).
Theory of mind and epistemological develop -
ment: the relation between children’s secondorder
false-belief understanding and their ability
to reason about evidence. New Ideas in Psycho -
logy, 20, 131–144.
Burr, J. E. & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epi ste -
mology and theory of mind: deciphering young
children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing.
New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199-224.
Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C.
(1989). “An experiment is when you try it and see
if it works”: A study of grade 7 students’ un -
derstanding of the construction of scientific
know ledge. International Journal of Science Edu -
cation, 11, 514–529.
Carey, S. & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the
nature of scientific knowledge. Educational
Psychologist, 28, 235-251.
Carpendale, J. & Chandler, M. (1996). On the
distinction between false belief understanding
and subscribing to an interpretive theory of mind.
Child Development, 67, 1686-1706.
Chandler, M., Hallett, D., & Sokol, B. (2002). Com -
peting claims about competing knowledge
claims. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds), Per -
sonal Epistemology: the psychology of beliefs
about knowledge and knowing (p.p.145-168),
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chandler, M. & Sokol, B. W. (1999). Representation
once removed: Children’s developing con -
ceptions of representational life. In I. E. Sigel
(Ed), Development of mental representation:
Theo ries and applications (p.p.201-230). NJ:
Erlbaum.
DeLoache, J. S. (2000). Dual representation and
young children’s understanding of scale models.
Child development, 71-2, 329-338.
Fagnant, A. & Crahay, M. (2011). Theories of mind
and personal epistemology: their interrelation
and connection with the concept of metaco -
gnition. European Journal of Psychology of
Education, 26, 2, 257-271.
Flavell, J. H (1988). The development of children’s
knowledge about the mind: From cognitive con -
nections to mental representation. In J. Asting -
ton, P. Harris & D. Olson (Eds.), Developing theo -
ries of mind (pp.244-270). Cambridge University
Press.
Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children’s know -
ledge about the mental world. International
Journal of Behavioral Developmen, 24, 15-23.
Flavell, J. H., (2004). Theory-of-Mind Development:
Retrospect and Prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarter -
ly, 50(3), 274-290.
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E.R. (1986).
Θεωρία του Νου και Επιστημικές Πεποιθήσεις 155
Development of Knowledge about the Ap -
pearance-Reality Distinction. Monographs of the
Society for Research in Child Development,
Serial No.212, 51(1).
Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993).
Cognitive Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory
of mind: Understanding of story characters’
thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally
handicapped, and normal children and adults.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
(2), 129-154.
Harris, P. &Gross, D. (1988). Children’s under -
standing of real and apparent emotion. In J. W.
Astington, P. L. Harris & D. R. Olson (Eds). De -
veloping Theories of Mind (p.p.295-314). Cam -
bridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding
as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud
during online searching. Educational Psycho -
logist, 39, 43–55.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research:
Implications for learning and instruction. Edu -
cational Psychology Review 13(4), 353-382.
Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development
of epistemological theories: Beliefs about know -
ledge and knowing and their relation to learning.
Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
Honda, M. (1994). Linguistic inquiry in the science
classroom: “It is science, but it’s not like a sci -
ence problem in a book.’’ Cambridge, MA: MIT
Working Papers in Linguistics.
Καραδημούλα, Δ. (2010). Θεωρία του Νου και Απο-
δοχή από τους συμμαθητές σε παιδιά προσχολι-
κής ηλικίας. Αδημοσίευτη μεταπτυχιακή εργα-
σία. Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity. MIT
Press.
King, P. M. & Kitchener K. S. (1994). Developing re -
flective judgement: Understanding and promoting
intellectual growth and critical thinking in adole -
scents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass Publishers.
Kitchener, R. F. (2002). Folk epistemology: an intro -
duction. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 89-105.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178-181.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The
development of epistemological understanding.
Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
Lockl, K. & Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about
the mind: Links between theory of mind and later
metamemory. Child Development, 78, 148-167.
Makris, N. & Pnevmatikos, D. (2007). Children’s un -
derstanding of human and super-natural mind.
Cognitive Development, 22(3), 365-375.
Maridaki-Kassotaki, K. & Antonopoulou, K. (2011).
Examination of the relationship between false-be -
lief understanding and referential com munication
skills. European Journal of Psycho logy of Educa -
tion, 26, 75-84.
Mason, L. & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of episte -
mological understanding and interest in inter -
preting a controversy and in topic specific belief
change. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
, 103-128.
Mason, L. & Bromme, R. (2010). Situating and re -
lating epistemological beliefs into metacognition:
studies on beliefs about knowledge and knowing.
Metacognition Learning, 5, 1-6.
Mason, L. & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’
argumentation skills about controversial topics
by epistemological understanding. Learning and
Instruction, 16, 492–509.
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Zurlo, G (2006). Episte -
mological understanding in different judgment
domains: Relationships with gender, grade level,
and curriculum. International Journal of Edu -
cational Research, 45, 43-56.
Μεταλλίδου Π. & Ματσάγγου, Ε. Η. (2009). Η ανά-
πτυξη της επιστημολογικής σκέψης σε διαφο-
ρετικούς τομείς κρίσεων. Στο Μ. Δικαίου, Ε. Γε-
ωργάκα, Π. Μεταλλίδου & Α. Ξενικού (Επιμ.
Έκδ.), Η’ Επιστημονική Επετηρίδα του Τμήματος
Ψυχολογίας (σσ. 363-397)
Μισαηλίδη, Π. & Μπονώτη, Φ. (2005). Απόδοση νοή-
ματος σε εικόνες και θεωρία του νου: η ανάπτυ-
ξη της ικανότητας των παιδιών να κατανοούν
την πρόθεση του δημιουργού μιας εικόνας. Επι-
στημονική επετηρίδα Ψυχολογικής Εταιρείας Βο-
ρείου Ελλάδος, τό ος 3, 229-248.
Misailidi, P. (2006). Young children’s display rule
knowledge: Understanding the distinction bet -
ween apparent and real emotions and the
motives underlying the use of display rules.
Social Behavior and Personality, 34(10), pp.1285-
Νατάσσα Κυριακοπούλου και Στέλλα Βοσνιάδου
Misailidi, P. & Bonoti, F. (2008). Emotion in children’s
art: do young children understand the emotions
expressed in other children’s drawings? Journal of
Early Childhood Research, vol. 6(2), pp. 189-200
Mitchell, P. & Lacohee, H. (1991). Children’s early
understanding of false belief. Cognition, 39, 107-
Montgomery, D. E. (1992). Young children’s theory of
knowing: The development of a folk epistemology.
Developmental Review, 12, 4, 410-430.
Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006).
Domain-generality and domain-specificity in per -
sonal epistemology research: Philosophical and
empirical reflections in the development of a
theoretical framework. Educational Psychology
Review, 18(1), 3-54.
Muris, P., Steerneman, P., Meesters, C., Merckel -
bach, H., Herselenberg, R., van den Hogen, T., &
van Dongen, L. (1999). The TOM test: a new in -
strument for assessing theory of mind in normal
children and children with pervasive develop -
mental disorders. Journal of Autism and Develop -
mental Disorders, 29, 67-80.
Parker, J. R., McDonald, C. A., & Miller, S. A. (2007).
“John Thinks That Mary Feels …” False Belief in
Children Across Affective and Physical Domains.
The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 43-62
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational
mind. MA: MIT Press.
Perner, J., Leekam, S., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Threeyear-
olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for
a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Develop -
mental Psychology, 5, 125-137.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical
development in the college years: A scheme.
New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Πολυχρόνη, Φ. (2009). Επιστημολογικές πεποιθή-
σεις: Διερεύνηση της δομής και της σχέσης
τους με τη σχολική επίδοση σε μαθητές Λυκεί-
ου. Ψυχολογία, 16(3), 321-341.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the
nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthezing epistemological
Belief Research: Tentative Understandings and
provocative confusions. Educational Psychology
Review 6(4), 293-319.
Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey,
M. G. (2000). Sixth graders’ epistemologies of
science: The impact of school science experi -
ences on epistemological development. Cogni -
tion and Instruction, 18, 349-422.
Smith, C. L. & Wenk, L. (2006). Relations among
Three Aspects of First-Year College Students’
Epistemologies of Science. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 43(8), 747-785.
Stathopoulou, C. & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring
the relationship between physics-related episte -
mological beliefs and physics understanding.
Contemporary Educational Psychology 32, 255-
Taylor, M. (1988). Conceptual Perspective Taking:
Children’s Ability to Distinguish What They Know
from What They See. Child Development, 59(3),
-718.
Taylor, M., Cartwright, B.S., & Bowden, T. (1991).
Perspective taking and theory of mind: do chil -
dren predict interpretive diversity as a function of
differences in observers’ knowledge?, Child De -
velopment, 62, 1334-1351.
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child’s theory of mind.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wellman, H. M. & Hickling, A. K. (1994). The minds
“I”: Children’s conception of the mind as an ac -
tive agent. Child Development, 65, 1564-1580.
Wellman, H. M. & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of Theoryof-
Mind Tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523-
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs:
Representation and constraining function of
wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding
of deception. Cognition 53, 45-57.
